Teams

Hagstette/40/6.5/CM/CP

2026 NO Southern Combo 40 & Over - Men · 6.5 NO (40&O) Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.12 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-09-02vs Staines/40/6.5/CM/LSLost 03
L#1 DoublesKenneth Humphreys / Judd Patterson vs Jourdan Generes / Greg Harris3-6
L#2 DoublesSteven Oliver / Timothy Mehok vs Patrick Thomas / Carl Monvoisin1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLarry Centola / Jared Zeller vs David Weiland / George Zacharia2-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 6.5 NO (40&O) Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hagstette/40/6.5/CM/CP000000
2Broussard/40/6.5/CM/NOLTC000000
3Orkus/40/6.5/CM/PRC000000
4SILVA/40/6.5/CM/CAPS000000
5Staines/40/6.5/CM/LS000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Kenneth Humphreys
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Adam Goldberg
published 3.5
3.09
Jared Zeller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Judd Patterson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Timothy Mehok
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Terry Ernst
published
2.83
Ashton Thomas
published 3
2.81
William Saas
published
2.80
2.73
Bill Godsey
published 3
2.69
Larry Centola
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Kurt Hagstette
published
Nathan Griffin
published
Scott Walker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charles Leininger + Judd Patterson4251% games+0.3% vs expected
Kurt Hagstette + Bill Godsey1544% gamesnot enough data
Kurt Hagstette + Larry Centola134 matchesnot enough data
Charles Leininger + Bill Godsey224 matchesnot enough data
Ashton Thomas + Kenneth Humphreys224 matchesnot enough data
Ashton Thomas + Bill Godsey123 matchesnot enough data
Ashton Thomas + Judd Patterson033 matchesnot enough data
Ashton Thomas + Terry Ernst033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kenneth Humphreys
40W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Adam Goldberg
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.13
Jared Zeller
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.09
Judd Patterson
35W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%85%14%
2.86
Timothy Mehok
22W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%86%13%
2.86
Terry Ernst
18W–16L career · no lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Ashton Thomas
23W–25L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.83
William Saas
6W–6L career · no lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Charles Leininger
29W–30L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Bill Godsey
24W–43L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Larry Centola
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
Kurt Hagstette
22W–30L career · no lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
Nathan Griffin
0W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Scott Walker
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.