Teams

BAY CLUB SF TENNIS 40MX7.0A

2023 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX7.0

25 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Anthea Pang
published 4
3.83
Bobby Carter
published 4
3.52
Mark Britschgi
published
3.50
Patrick Haley
published
3.42
Russ Iwanchuk
published
3.40
Kurt Kwok
published
3.40
Kristen Steck
published
3.36
Shan Lu
published
3.33
Alan Tse
published 3.5
3.31
Nilgun Reed
published
3.29
Satish Gudiboina
published
3.29
Leilani Latimer
published
3.27
Su-Mien Chong
published
3.26
Tonya Vincent
published
Alvaro Jimenez
published 3.5
3.13
Michael Han
published
3.11
Dena Mcnulty
published 3.5
3.11
Jing Gu
published
3.07
3.05
Jean-Marc Sallenave
published
3.02
Risa Meyer
published
2.90
Paul Swink
published
Eric Isaacs
published
Matthew Cooney
published
Mimi Lim
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anthea Pang
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Bobby Carter
37W–21L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83
Mark Britschgi
14W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.52
Patrick Haley
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.50
Russ Iwanchuk
17W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.42
Kurt Kwok
1W–13L career · no lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
3.40
Kristen Steck
15W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
Shan Lu
7W–14L career · no lines in 2023
84%16%<1%
3.36
3.5
Alan Tse
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
Nilgun Reed
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
Satish Gudiboina
10W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
Leilani Latimer
12W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
Su-Mien Chong
11W–12L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Tonya Vincent
19W–18L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Alvaro Jimenez
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Han
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Dena Mcnulty
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
Jing Gu
14W–29L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
Joyce Noah-Vanhoucke
8W–25L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
Jean-Marc Sallenave
4W–12L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.05
Risa Meyer
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
3.02
Paul Swink
5W–12L career · no lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
2.90
Eric Isaacs
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Matthew Cooney
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mimi Lim
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.