Teams

Ke.Hurter18A

2025 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-09vs Sh.Marconi18AWon 10
W#2 DoublesDebi Booker / Angela McGee vs KC Griffin / Ann Flores3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-05-02vs Me.McCaskill18AWon 10
W#1 DoublesMegan Oneill / Angela McGee vs Katherine Teague / Stephanie Sneeden6-1, 6-3
2025-04-25vs Su.Potter18ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesKelly Hurter / Megan Oneill vs Darsan Russo / Diane Bosnjak King6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBeth Russo / Angela McGee vs Cynthia Midyett Hardy / Susan Potter3-6, 2-6
2025-04-25vs Ra.Rosen18AWon 10
W#1 DoublesRebecca Harris / Angela McGee vs Randi Rosen / Lusally Hong6-4, 7-5
2025-03-21vs Ho.Gyovai18ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesCaroline Ives / Angela McGee vs Kimberlie Meeker / Holly Gyovai2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKelly Hurter / Beth Russo vs Natalie Mayur / Elena Stimmel6-4, 6-0
2025-03-14vs As.Randall18ALost 01
L#1 DoublesKelly Hurter / Megan Oneill vs Heidi Suke / Ashley Whited0-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-03-07vs Sh.Marconi18AWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Cantando / Caroline Ives vs Ann Flores / Angela Myers6-2, 6-4
2025-02-28vs Me.McCaskill18AWon 20
W#1 DoublesRebecca Harris / Caroline Ives vs Jenny Anderson / Christine Stone6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDebi Booker / Brandy Vannoy vs Holly Austin / Lisa Hauser6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.55 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Amy Cantando
published 3
2.74
Megan Oneill
published
2.67
Angela McGee
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.62
Kelly Hurter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.47
Caroline Ives
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.27
Brandy Vannoy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.21
Debi Booker
published 2.5
Rebecca Harris
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela McGee + Kelly Hurter8260% games+10.7% vs expected
Angela McGee + Caroline Ives4645% games+1.2% vs expected
Kelly Hurter + Brandy Vannoy3246% gamesnot enough data
Caroline Ives + Kelly Hurter213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amy Cantando
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
Megan Oneill
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
2.5
Angela McGee
47W–45L career · 9 lines in 2025
0%10%90%
2.67
2.5
Kelly Hurter
54W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%19%81%
2.62
3
Caroline Ives
23W–33L career · 7 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.47
2.5
Brandy Vannoy
21W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Debi Booker
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.21
Rebecca Harris
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.