Teams

Oahu Ninjas 9.0

2024 Mixed 18 and Over League · 9.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.40 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-03-10vs Manoa MastersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJane Schumacker / Daisuke Takagi vs Kurt Irvine / Junko Kadomatsu1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMiyuki Haught / Steven Miyauchi vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-03-03vs Disaster INC 9Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMari Tadaki / Go Kobayashi vs Tyler Makabe / Shannon Oba6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesChandler Howell / Jackie Holm vs Kerrie Ann Torigoe / Lloyd Yamada2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLu Tian / Alec Schumacker vs Sarah Kukino / Spencer Dang7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2024-02-25vs Ace Ace In Your FaceSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLu Tian / Shawn Morimoto vs Shaina Yeung / David Imanaka2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNikki Morimoto / Steven Miyauchi vs Angelie Cook / Justin Au6-2, 6-3
2024-02-11vs KRC All Mixed UpWon 21
W#1 DoublesJane Schumacker / Alec Schumacker vs Kimi Gabbard / Bhakti Gabbard6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJackie Holm / Dax Matthews vs Katelyn Sweeney Ching / Todd Hall0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMiyuki Haught / Chandler Howell vs Keri Gall / Richard Gregory6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-02-04vs Manoa MastersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMari Tadaki / Go Kobayashi vs Berylin Lau / Maximus Hui4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJackie Holm / Jun Takayama vs Kara Shibata / Kurt Irvine7-6, 6-1
2024-01-28vs Disaster INC 9Won 20
W#1 DoublesJane Schumacker / Daisuke Takagi vs Jan Matsumoto / Tyler Makabe6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNikki Morimoto / Shawn Morimoto vs Leslie Fujitani / Jace Akagi-Okuma6-3, 6-2
2024-01-21vs Ace Ace In Your FaceWon 21
W#1 DoublesNikki Morimoto / Jun Takayama vs Angelie Cook / Justin Au6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMari Tadaki / Dax Matthews vs Shaina Yeung / Harold Shimono7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLu Tian / Alec Schumacker vs Kasey Yamashita / Kyle Shiroma4-6, 2-6
2024-01-07vs KRC All Mixed UpWon 30
W#1 DoublesMari Tadaki / Go Kobayashi vs Kimi Gabbard / Bhakti Gabbard6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNikki Morimoto / Shawn Morimoto vs Brooke Heiken / John Kennedy6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJane Schumacker / Steven Miyauchi vs Keri Gall / Jared Carstenn6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.14 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.65
Melissa Kobayakawa
published
4.35
Mari Tadaki
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.33
Shawn Morimoto
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.26
Jane Schumacker
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Chandler Howell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Daisuke Takagi
published 4.5
4.23
Nikki Morimoto
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.20
Alec Schumacker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.12
Lu Tian
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.11
Jackie Holm
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.05
Miyuki Haught
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.88
Jackson Fong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Dax Matthews
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Go Kobayashi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Jun Takayama
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Steven Miyauchi
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shawn Morimoto + Nikki Morimoto6162% games−0.7% vs expected
Alec Schumacker + Jane Schumacker5450% games−1.7% vs expected
Jackson Fong + Melissa Kobayakawa5257% gamesnot enough data
Jackie Holm + Daisuke Takagi3254% gamesnot enough data
Lu Tian + Jun Takayama134 matchesnot enough data
Go Kobayashi + Mari Tadaki314 matchesnot enough data
Jun Takayama + Melissa Kobayakawa303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa Kobayakawa
9W–3L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.65
4.5
Mari Tadaki
32W–21L career · type S · 4 lines in 2024
1%86%14%
4.35
Shawn Morimoto
21W–10L career · 1 line in 2024
1%87%12%
4.33
4.5
Jane Schumacker
45W–32L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%92%4%
4.26
4.5
Chandler Howell
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Daisuke Takagi
10W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Nikki Morimoto
90W–27L career · 8 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Alec Schumacker
9W–12L career · 1 line in 2024
8%91%2%
4.20
Lu Tian
13W–37L career · 6 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
4.12
4.5
Jackie Holm
52W–60L career · 5 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
4.11
4.5
Miyuki Haught
111W–79L career · 5 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
4.05
Jackson Fong
56W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Dax Matthews
9W–7L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Go Kobayashi
51W–23L career · 3 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.71
Jun Takayama
22W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Steven Miyauchi
6W–1L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.