Teams

UPTA54f/Willmering/Brookstone

2026 UPTA Fall 54 & Over-Women · 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Teresa Carson
published
3.36
Donetta Dodwell
published 3.5
3.30
Annette Curin
published 3.5
3.24
Rebecca Sandborg
published
3.17
Peg Loyd
published
3.15
Sharon Colker
published
3.14
Doni Willmering
published 3.5
3.12
Candice Diggins
published 3.5
3.09
Deana Fisher
published 3.5
3.05
Angie McDade
published 3.5
3.04
Angie Hunt
published 3.5
2.95
TRINA NEGRI
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Candice Diggins + Annette Curin4255% games+3.0% vs expected
Doni Willmering + Deana Fisher2443% games−8.3% vs expected
Teresa Carson + Donetta Dodwell224 matchesnot enough data
Angie McDade + Annette Curin404 matchesnot enough data
Doni Willmering + Annette Curin134 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Sandborg + Deana Fisher134 matchesnot enough data
Sharon Colker + Annette Curin123 matchesnot enough data
Angie McDade + TRINA NEGRI303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Teresa Carson
23W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
3.41
3.5
Donetta Dodwell
13W–11L career · no lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Annette Curin
36W–33L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
Rebecca Sandborg
42W–36L career · no lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
Peg Loyd
9W–10L career · no lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
Sharon Colker
6W–15L career · no lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Doni Willmering
23W–24L career · no lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Candice Diggins
18W–23L career · no lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Deana Fisher
15W–22L career · no lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Angie McDade
18W–24L career · no lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.05
3.5
Angie Hunt
2W–10L career · type S · no lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.04
TRINA NEGRI
54W–19L career · no lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.