Teams

McKinley, Lois

2023 Adult 65 & Over 6.0 - 9.0 · 7.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-05-22vs HOA/Bennett/65&Over7.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesBarbara Yannone / Maria Victoria Johnson vs Candace Herman / Debbie Flynn2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLois McKinley / Kim McRae vs Delane Cohen / Anne Miller2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJody McClain / Susan Warshawsky vs Barbara Wood / Stephanie Gunderson7-6, 5-2
2023-05-18vs Jacelone, MarciaWon 21
W#1 DoublesLois McKinley / Kim McRae vs Diana Dark / Cheryl Vaught6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSarah Pinder / Jane Slavik vs Marla Lovinggood / Ann Bender1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJody McClain / Susan Warshawsky vs Susan McConkey / Janet Beasing6-3, 6-2
2023-05-11vs Levalley, CarolLost 12
W#1 DoublesMaria Victoria Johnson / Jane Slavik vs Marcia Robertson / Candace Bickford6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Warshawsky / Barbara Yannone vs Donna Turnbull / Roberta Dierks4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKim McRae / Sarah Pinder vs Connie Johnson / Joan Liechty3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 7.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOA/Bennett/65&Over7.0W3063765
2Jacelone, Marcia12451086
3McKinley, Lois12451184
4Levalley, Carol12451185

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Kim McRae
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.91
Lois McKinley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.67
Jody McClain
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Barbara Yannone
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jane Slavik
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Judith James
published
Maria Victoria Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ruth West
published
Sarah Pinder
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Susan Warshawsky
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Virginia Davis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jody McClain + Sarah Pinder033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim McRae
38W–69L career · 3 lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
2.98
Lois McKinley
47W–63L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
2.91
Jody McClain
42W–72L career · 2 lines in 2023
10%90%1%
2.67
Barbara Yannone
13W–21L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jane Slavik
33W–33L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Judith James
16W–26L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Maria Victoria Johnson
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Ruth West
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sarah Pinder
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Warshawsky
13W–16L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Virginia Davis
19W–36L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.