Teams

Martin/Knoxville

2024 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League-Knoxville · 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-12-02vs King/KnoxvilleLost 23
L#1 DoublesAnn Brady / Pamela Prax vs Kelly Kramer / Tracy Collins0-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesLori DeRoos vs Emily Elison6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAmanda Martin / Stacey Wright vs Barbara McCarty / Kelley Karnes6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 SinglesHilleary Chandler vs Jace Lundstrom6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDawn Coleman / Angie Epps vs Kelly Hollingsworth / Kimberly Nelson3-6, 2-6
2023-11-25vs Huffman/KnoxvilleSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAmanda Martin / Ann Brady vs Patsy Fischer / Belinda Gambuzza6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLori DeRoos vs Erica Zuhr6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAnita Downes / Pamela Prax vs Sharon Clark / Gabriella Rimmer2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDawn Coleman / Angie Epps vs Mindi Bowling / Maja Lugonjic6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-11-19vs Huffman/KnoxvilleLost 13
L#1 SinglesLori DeRoos vs Sarah Warren1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAngie Epps / Dawn Coleman vs Lisa Huffman / Belinda Gambuzza6-4, 7-5
L#2 SinglesDawn Duke vs Cindi Mooney2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLibby Hicks / Pamela Prax vs Debi English / Sharon Clark3-6, 1-6
2023-11-12vs King/KnoxvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesAmanda Martin / Ann Brady vs Kristin Monge / Kimberly Nelson2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesLori DeRoos vs Emily Elison6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLibby Hicks / Amanda Smith vs Kelly Hollingsworth / Veronica Whaley3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesStacey Wright vs Jennifer McVeigh7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAnna Taylor / Angie Epps vs Kelley Karnes / Tracy Collins6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2023-11-11vs King/KnoxvilleLost 05
L#1 DoublesStacey Wright / Michelle Wakefield vs Kimberly Nelson / Emily Elison6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLori DeRoos vs Allison King3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAmanda Smith / Hilleary Chandler vs Kelly Kramer / Tracy Collins4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesDawn Duke vs Jennifer McVeigh2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDawn Coleman / Anita Downes vs Karen Dail / Kelly Hollingsworth2-6, 2-6
2023-11-04vs Huffman/KnoxvilleLost 13
L#1 DoublesAngie Epps / Dawn Coleman vs Rosa Luttrell / Gabriella Rimmer2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesLori DeRoos vs HAILEY NEDS6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmanda Martin / Dawn Duke vs Sharon Clark / Mindi Bowling1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAnita Downes / Pamela Prax vs Lisa Huffman / Cindi Mooney5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Full Moon/Knoxville5121923237
2King/Knoxville42201029259
3Martin/Knoxville1582246304
4YoderSmith/KNOXVILLE0652554346

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Lori DeRoos
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Hilleary Chandler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Shelly Ren
published
3.13
Pamela Prax
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.10
Angie Epps
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.10
Dawn Coleman
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.09
Anita Downes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.02
Stacey Wright
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.01
Ann Brady
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.43
Libby Hicks
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.34
Dawn Duke
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Mariya Zhuravleva
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Michelle Wakefield
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angie Epps + Dawn Coleman62139% games−4.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori DeRoos
31W–30L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Hilleary Chandler
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Shelly Ren
17W–41L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
Pamela Prax
23W–22L career · 4 lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Angie Epps
16W–46L career · 5 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Dawn Coleman
11W–41L career · 5 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.10
3
Anita Downes
27W–26L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%23%77%
3.09
Stacey Wright
9W–43L career · 3 lines in 2024
44%55%<1%
3.02
3.5
Ann Brady
8W–22L career · 3 lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.01
Libby Hicks
7W–30L career · 2 lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
2.43
2.5
Dawn Duke
3W–15L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%89%11%
2.34
Mariya Zhuravleva
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Michelle Wakefield
2W–16L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.