Teams

SD 8.0 Peninsula/ Gallego

2022 Mixed Doubles 18 & Over Winter - SD · SD - 8.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.88 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-12vs SD LLW 8.0 Mountain View/ AquinoLost 01
L#2 DoublesSteve Potter / Cathy Swindlehurst vs Guadalupe Rendon / Justin Tjalma0-6, 1-6
2022-03-05vs SD 8.0 La Jolla TC/ HeinSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJason Hom / Cheryle Pillow vs Bradley Blose / Leslie Sauer6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSteve Potter / Kim Latham vs Chakib Bouhdary / Ciara Levine7-5, 6-2
2022-02-26vs SD LLW 8.0 Mountain View/ AquinoLost 02
L#1 DoublesTim Pillow / Maegen Demko vs Guadalupe Rendon / Justin Tjalma1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSteve Potter / Cathy Swindlehurst vs Norman Granger / Edna Rendon2-6, 1-6
2022-02-19vs SD 8.0 ECCTA/ HwangLost 01
L#2 DoublesMaegen Demko / Tim Pillow vs Deborah Fitzgerald / Charles Hamori1-6, 3-6
2022-02-12vs SD 8.0 La Jolla TC/ HeinLost 01
L#3 DoublesSteve Potter / Kim Latham vs Kathleen Bouhdary / Chakib Bouhdary0-6, 1-6
2022-02-05vs SD 8.0 SDT&R/ ChannickLost 01
L#2 DoublesCheryle Pillow / Jason Hom vs Linda Milburn / Jeffrey Russell5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2022-01-08vs SD 8.0 Mountain View/ WestWon 10
W#1 DoublesTim Pillow / Maegen Demko vs Marc Kieu / Elizabeth Ponce6-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Maegen Demko
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.83
Tim Pillow
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Bret Michaelsen
published 4
3.64
Kim Latham
published
3.27
Steve Potter
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.88
Cheryle Pillow
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Jason Hom
published
Kenny Rosenberg
published
Mark Bauer
published
May Sotthivirat
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tim Pillow + Cheryle Pillow5445% games−7.3% vs expected
Tim Pillow + Maegen Demko134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Maegen Demko
101W–74L career · 3 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
4.17
4
Tim Pillow
50W–69L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Bret Michaelsen
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kim Latham
15W–10L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
Steve Potter
33W–80L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3
Cheryle Pillow
63W–73L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
Jason Hom
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kenny Rosenberg
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mark Bauer
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
May Sotthivirat
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.