Teams

Willard - Team 2Fun

2026 Hampton Roads Tri-Level · Hampton Roads Tri-Level 4.5. 4.0, 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.86 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-31vs DomanskiWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Willard / Lisa Green vs Laurie Marshall / Elvie Sellers6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJoan Corkery / Veronica Cummings vs Kelly Long / Jessica Simpson1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRebecca Hartt / Cleary Maly vs Laura Smith / Amy Boyer6-3, 7-6
2026-08-17vs U - ClaxtonLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Willard / Angela Gilliam vs Katherine Claxton / Raquel Kohler0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJoan Corkery / Sarah Phillips vs Courtney Kellam / Claire Walters3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCary Kelly / Rebecca Hartt vs Stephanie Granger / Megan Farr4-6, 4-6
2026-08-14vs DomanskiLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Willard / Angela Gilliam vs Kelly Long / Elvie Sellers2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHolli Sawyer / Joan Corkery vs Betty Domanski / Flurry Yanez6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCary Kelly / Betsey Riester vs Alyse Chickey / Kristina Chastain1-6, 3-6
2026-08-10vs U - ClaxtonLost 12
W#1 DoublesLisa Green / Susan Willard vs Courtney Violette / Laurie Gigliotti6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesHolli Sawyer / Veronica Cummings vs Tessa Robinson / Emily Martin1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Haynes / Cleary Maly vs Anne Randolph Brown / Liz Martin3-6, 3-6
2026-08-07vs U - ClaxtonWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Willard / Lisa Green vs Katherine Claxton / Laura Stone6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSarah Phillips / Shawen Bartol vs Courtney Kellam / Lori Cox7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesRebecca Hartt / Cleary Maly vs Megan Farr / Lauren Kiger7-5, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Hampton Roads Tri-Level 4.5. 4.0, 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Susan Willard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Angela Gilliam
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.76
Cleary Maly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.71
Holli Sawyer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Sheila Filipponi
published
3.65
Shawen Bartol
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Rebecca Hartt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Veronica Cummings
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Joan Corkery
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Cary Kelly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Elizabeth Haynes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shawen Bartol + Joan Corkery7453% games−4.9% vs expected
Veronica Cummings + Holli Sawyer213 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Hartt + Cleary Maly213 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Hartt + Cary Kelly213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Willard
7W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
4.36
4.5
Angela Gilliam
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Cleary Maly
12W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.76
4
Holli Sawyer
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.71
Sheila Filipponi
2W–4L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Shawen Bartol
73W–36L career · 1 line in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.65
Rebecca Hartt
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%86%<1%
3.64
Veronica Cummings
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Joan Corkery
64W–58L career · 3 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.55
3.5
Cary Kelly
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Elizabeth Haynes
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.