Teams

Hollenshead/18/3.0/WD/UC

2026 City Championship 18 & Over - Women Day · 3.0 (18&O) Women Day

20 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 (18&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Natalie Padial
published
2.90
Yushen Lee
published
2.89
2.87
Danielle Mensman
published 3
2.82
Alison Williams
published 3
2.75
Patricia McCann
published
Cindy Ourso
published 3
2.74
Dana Feng
published 3
2.72
Jade McDowell
published
2.72
Tanya Berthelot
published
2.71
Gerre Guarisco
published
2.71
Tiffany Mannino
published
2.70
Tammy Heard
published
2.63
Kristina Rodriguez
published
2.62
Grace Breaux
published
2.60
Jamie Ourso
published
2.56
Jackie Blount
published
2.54
Jenny Kaine
published
2.38
MacKenzie Landry
published
Julie Jackson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tiffany Mannino + Danielle Mensman4458% games+11.1% vs expected
Michelle Hollenshead + Tammy Heard5071% games+10.3% vs expected
Yushen Lee + Dana Feng5357% games+6.8% vs expected
Kristina Rodriguez + MacKenzie Landry134 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Hollenshead + Kristina Rodriguez213 matchesnot enough data
Tiffany Mannino + Tammy Heard123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie Padial
18W–9L career · no lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
Yushen Lee
7W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
2.90
Michelle Hollenshead
38W–30L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Danielle Mensman
14W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.87
3
Alison Williams
11W–6L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Patricia McCann
7W–7L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Cindy Ourso
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Dana Feng
11W–9L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
Jade McDowell
12W–15L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Tanya Berthelot
9W–5L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Gerre Guarisco
6W–7L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
Tiffany Mannino
22W–24L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Tammy Heard
22W–19L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70
Kristina Rodriguez
16W–28L career · no lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63
Grace Breaux
26W–15L career · no lines in 2026
0%21%79%
2.62
Jamie Ourso
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.60
Jackie Blount
6W–5L career · no lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
Jenny Kaine
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
2.54
MacKenzie Landry
9W–14L career · no lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
2.38
Julie Jackson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.