← Teams

SAC-McElravey

2019 Adult 18 & Over · 5.0+ Men

3 players · average NTRP 4.67 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Marcus Eyth
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
—
Brian Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
—
James Graber
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
Results6 ties
2019-04-07Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesJames Graber / Brian Joelson vs Cameron Ahari / Kean Patrick6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesScott Erickson / Brian Jackson vs Mark DeMaine / David Yahng5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2019-03-10Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesJames Graber / Brian Jackson vs Juan Presichi / Charles Gates6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2019-02-09Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesJames Graber / Avinash Ananthakrishnan vs Malino Oda / Dougal Williams6-4, 6-2
2019-01-27Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesBrian Jackson / Brian Joelson vs Brandt Wegner / Josh Schweitz2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2019-01-19Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesJames Graber / Toby Mcelravey vs Gram Leahy / Nicolas Mulflur6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2019-01-06Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesBrian Joelson / James Graber vs Sean Eberle / Vetu Mam6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMarcus Eyth / Scott Erickson vs Geoffrey Pohl / Andrew Pritchard6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

5
Marcus Eyth
11W–28L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Brian Jackson
33W–18L career
not enough data
—
4.5
James Graber
11W–21L career · type M
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.