Teams

WNCS Manley (ARC S)

Adult 18 & Over WNC USTA 2025 · 18 & O 4.0 Women Monday evening

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-05vs WNCR Pino (CC of A)Won 50
W#1 DoublesDonna Loftin / Angela Newnam vs Evie Tashie / Becky Sanft7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJennifer Hull vs Elizabeth Schoen6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesTara Kerr / Kelly Haycook vs Leeann Kelley / Lauren Maggard6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKelly Loisel vs Rawson Baylor5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMartha Habegger / Hilary Thomas vs Fiona Teague / Susan Marcus6-3, 6-2
2025-04-28vs WNCS Voyles (ARC S)Won 50
W#1 DoublesKelly Haycook / Kathy Kinnamon vs Sherrie Voyles / Sarah Corley6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJane Christen vs Alexis Rosenfelt6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHilary Thomas / Amanda Williams vs Tracey Walker / Eva Hartman6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJennifer Hull vs Rebecca Carchman6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRachel Horn / Stacey Schulhofer vs Tina Kinard / Karolina Drozdz3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-03-31vs WNCR Pino (CC of A)Won 41
W#1 DoublesHilary Thomas / Martha Habegger vs Lauren Maggard / Susan Marcus6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJane Christen vs Becky Sanft6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDonna Loftin / Angela Newnam vs Evie Tashie / Nicole Ingle4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJennifer Hull vs Elizabeth Schoen6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesTara Kerr / Amanda Williams vs Johanna Spellman / Fiona Teague6-7, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & O 4.0 Women Monday evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Beate Madden
published 4
3.95
Hilary Thomas
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.95
Jane Christen
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.86
Jennifer Hull
usually #2 Singles 44%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
3.84
Rachel Horn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Jennie West
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.77
Kelly Loisel
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.72
Kathy Kinnamon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Martha Habegger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.69
Stacey Schulhofer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Tara Kerr
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.62
Kelly Haycook
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.61
Angela Newnam
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.59
Donna Loftin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hilary Thomas + Martha Habegger5077% games+12.8% vs expected
Jennie West + Hilary Thomas12158% games+7.3% vs expected
Donna Loftin + Angela Newnam12952% games+1.8% vs expected
Kelly Haycook + Kathy Kinnamon6349% games−4.9% vs expected
Stacey Schulhofer + Rachel Horn314 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Hull + Beate Madden123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Beate Madden
24W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
4.01
Hilary Thomas
28W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.95
Jane Christen
23W–14L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.95
Jennifer Hull
26W–18L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.86
Rachel Horn
20W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
Jennie West
40W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Kelly Loisel
12W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.77
Kathy Kinnamon
14W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Martha Habegger
18W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.70
Stacey Schulhofer
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Tara Kerr
7W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.64
Kelly Haycook
15W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
Angela Newnam
23W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Donna Loftin
18W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
3.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.