Teams

TTC - Leiter

2021 Brevard Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-05-24vs Brevard - Rockledge / KubeLost 03
L#1 DoublesCourtney Thomassen / Emily Criste vs Nicole Bertran / Michelle Ruether3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesTee Wells vs Sherry Houston3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLyuda Saks / Leslie Pankey vs Suzanne Kube / Heather Harris3-6, 2-6
2021-05-17vs Suntree - FordWon 21
W#1 DoublesEmily Criste / Courtney Thomassen vs Mandy Smith / Tandy Baerst7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesTee Wells vs Kiana Zanganeh6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLori Abbott / Lyuda Saks vs Lina Ruhlman / Caroline Jiborn6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-05-10vs Fee - BrownWon 20
W#1 DoublesLori Abbott / Lyuda Saks vs Amber Saxon / Cindy Rhoton7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJune Leiter / Emily Criste vs Katharyn Luer / Angela Hofmann6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2021-05-03vs TTC - TaylorWon 20
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Rebadow / Lyuda Saks vs Milena Alicea / Trisha Watson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesTee Wells vs Eileen Stapleton7-6, 6-2
2021-04-26vs Kiwi - SalvatoreWon 20
W#1 DoublesLori Abbott / Lyuda Saks vs Laura Rochester / ANITA CARBONE6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEmily Criste / Tammy Bertolini vs Lisa Zizzo / Lily Voepel3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-04-19vs EGYC - MacKayLost 01
L#1 DoublesEmily Criste / Lyuda Saks vs Catherine Platt / Jennifer Borboroglu0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-04-12vs Singleton - DensonWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Criste / Courtney Thomassen vs Darlissa Salazar / Mary Truesdell6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
3.28
Tee Wells
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 30% · published 3.5
3.20
Lyuda Saks
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Mary Failla
published
3.15
Emily Criste
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Petra Elliott
published
2.85
June Leiter
published
2.42
Tammy Bertolini
published
2.35
Bev Wilcocks
published 3
Jessica Martinez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Criste + Courtney Thomassen6354% games+13.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Courtney Thomassen
65W–45L career · no lines in 2021
8%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Tee Wells
129W–96L career · 10 lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Lyuda Saks
88W–77L career · 6 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.20
Mary Failla
10W–5L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Emily Criste
81W–155L career · 6 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.15
Petra Elliott
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
<1%56%44%
2.98
June Leiter
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
88%12%<1%
2.85
Tammy Bertolini
6W–5L career · no lines in 2021
0%74%26%
2.42
3
Bev Wilcocks
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
87%13%<1%
2.35
Jessica Martinez
4W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.