Teams

LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV

2021 NTA ADULT FALL LEAGUE · 3.0 MEN

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-12-04vs DTC #4Won 10
W#3 DoublesCorey Zimet / Ryan Popowcer vs Roger Guzman / JOHN CHAMSI6-1, 6-1
2021-11-20vs DTC #2Won 10
W#3 DoublesFareed Sayegh / Corey Zimet vs James Campbell / Brian Kay6-2, 6-4
2021-11-09vs TPCLost 01
L#2 DoublesCorey Zimet / Fareed Sayegh vs John Shook / Alex Cook6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2021-10-16vs DTC #3Lost 01
L#3 DoublesRuben Bonilla / Corey Zimet vs Josh Haldeman / Frederick Shelton2-6, 4-6
2021-10-09vs CLUB RIDGESLost 01
L#1 SinglesCorey Zimet vs David Fultz4-6, 1-6
2021-09-25Won 10
W#1 SinglesCorey Zimet vs Sky Tillmond6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Thomas Cunningham
published
3.86
Tyler Gaston
published
3.15
Ryan Popowcer
published
3.15
Roger Martinez
published
Chris Fitapelli
published 3
Derrick Hunter
published 3
2.63
Corey Zimet
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.49
Rafael Delgado
published
Matthew Cox
published
Parviz Heshmati
published
Robert Carlson
published
Ruben Bonilla
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Parviz Heshmati + Corey Zimet7359% games+10.7% vs expected
Derrick Hunter + Ryan Popowcer9756% games+8.0% vs expected
Parviz Heshmati + Roger Martinez5451% games+5.4% vs expected
Roger Martinez + Corey Zimet10557% games+3.2% vs expected
Roger Martinez + Derrick Hunter7448% games+3.1% vs expected
Rafael Delgado + Corey Zimet71240% games+0.9% vs expected
Matthew Cox + Roger Martinez9751% games+0.8% vs expected
Rafael Delgado + Ruben Bonilla1634% games−2.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thomas Cunningham
94W–70L career · no lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
3.87
Tyler Gaston
184W–86L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.86
Ryan Popowcer
43W–38L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.15
Roger Martinez
108W–128L career · no lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.15
3
Chris Fitapelli
10W–35L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Derrick Hunter
61W–63L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Corey Zimet
103W–143L career · 6 lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
2.63
Rafael Delgado
43W–70L career · no lines in 2021
54%46%<1%
2.49
Matthew Cox
22W–23L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Parviz Heshmati
36W–27L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Robert Carlson
25W–25L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Ruben Bonilla
8W–24L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.