Teams

Roller/LR/Chenal

2025 Adult Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-01-13vs Rech/LR/RebsWon 20
W#1 SinglesKaitlyn Witherell vs Yan Sun6-0, 5-7
W#2 SinglesLanie Driver vs Jessica Leach6-0, 6-1
2025-12-17vs Webster/RebsWon 20
W#1 SinglesAshley Burch vs Anna Simpson6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesKaitlyn Witherell vs Anna Coon6-2, 6-0
2025-12-10vs Doose/Jones/LR/RebsWon 20
W#1 SinglesAshley Burch vs Stefan Jones6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesLauren Roller vs Morgan Doughty6-2, 7-5
2025-11-19vs Rutledge/LR/RebsLost 12
W#1 SinglesLanie Driver vs Susan Allison6-2, 6-0
L#2 SinglesAshlee Holmes vs Leslie Warford2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesCindy Winar vs Roz Taylor0-6, 6-2
2025-11-16vs Anthony/LR/CCLRWon 30
W#1 SinglesKaitlyn Witherell vs Allison Anthony6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesLauren Roller vs Jacey Guthrie6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesClaire Althoff vs Mary Nell McBryde6-2, 6-4
2025-11-11vs Duff/LR/BPWon 30
W#1 SinglesKaitlyn Witherell vs Robbie Ward6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesKaitlen Stewart vs Tiffanie Taylor5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 SinglesLanie Driver vs Denise Allen-Duff7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2025-11-05vs Welker/LR/RebsWon 30
W#1 SinglesKaitlyn Witherell vs Molly Scott6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAshley Burch vs Elizabeth Cook7-6, 6-1
W#3 SinglesLauren Roller vs Alex Richard6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Ashley Burch
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
3.17
Kaitlyn Witherell
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.07
Lanie Driver
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.01
Kaitlen Stewart
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.98
Lauren Roller
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.97
Claire Althoff
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Ashlee Holmes
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
Cindy Winar
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claire Althoff + Lauren Roller7075% games+15.9% vs expected
Kaitlyn Witherell + Lanie Driver404 matchesnot enough data
Kaitlyn Witherell + Lauren Roller303 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Roller + Ashley Burch303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ashley Burch
18W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.38
Kaitlyn Witherell
41W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.17
Lanie Driver
40W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.07
Kaitlen Stewart
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.01
Lauren Roller
20W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Claire Althoff
15W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Ashlee Holmes
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Cindy Winar
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.