Teams

Team 3 Last Chance Saloon

2022 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Summer Indoor · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.40 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-07-20vs Team 1Won 10
W#2 DoublesGeorge Gold / Bob Cusack vs Scott Darling / Michael Fogarty6-3, 6-1
2022-07-10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCharles Tellis / Antonio Costa vs John Doe / Tung Huynh3-6, 6-5
2022-07-06vs Team 1Won 10
W#1 DoublesLiviu Carare / George Gold vs Peter Davidson / David McGinness6-2, 6-3
2022-06-26Won 10
W#1 DoublesAntonio Costa / Charles Tellis vs John Doe / Tung Huynh3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-06-15vs Team 1Won 10
W#1 DoublesLiviu Carare / George Gold vs Peter Davidson / John O'Dwyer6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Aravind Krishna
published 5
4.29
Liviu Carare
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.22
Charles Tellis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.89
W J Peterson
published
3.85
Michael Healy
published
3.76
Neil McConnell
published
George Gold
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Jeff Buhl
published
3.65
Jeff Rosenblum
published
3.63
Chris Ford
published 4
3.34
Scott Williams
published
Sumeet Chawla
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charles Tellis + George Gold123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Aravind Krishna
37W–48L career · no lines in 2022
86%14%<1%
4.36
4.5
Liviu Carare
227W–119L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.29
4.5
Charles Tellis
92W–54L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.22
W J Peterson
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
81%19%<1%
3.89
Michael Healy
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.85
Neil McConnell
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.76
4
George Gold
20W–64L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jeff Buhl
21W–12L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Jeff Rosenblum
40W–31L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Chris Ford
11W–11L career · no lines in 2022
16%83%<1%
3.63
Scott Williams
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%0%
3.34
Sumeet Chawla
23W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.