Teams

CIN A40 3.0M DCC Stuckey

Early Start Fall CIN Indy Adult 40 & Over · CIN Indy 40 & Over 3.0 Men, F

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / CENTRAL INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-16vs CIN A40 3.0M JCC ShippyLost 12
L#1 DoublesWilliam Chesterfield / Andy Powers vs Michael Belschner / Dan Osborn2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAdam Hunter vs Caleb Harper6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesEdward Bentley / Brian Dipiro vs Eugene Kontarzhy / Joel Roellgen0-6, 2-6
2024-11-09vs CIN A40 3.0M CRC PetryLost 01
L#1 DoublesGene Dodge / Edward Bentley vs Theodore Thompson / Armando Rodriguez4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-11-02vs CIN A40 3.0M IRCD FrizzellLost 01
L#1 DoublesBill Jerrow / Brian Dipiro vs David Frizzell / Dustin Demilt2-6, 0-6
2024-10-26vs CIN A40 3.0M IRCD GuptaLost 01
L#1 DoublesEdward Bentley / Gene Dodge vs Jon Fisher / Skip Vorhees3-6, 3-6
2024-10-05vs CIN A40 3.0M CRC PetryLost 12
L#1 DoublesEdward Bentley / Adam Hunter vs Armando Rodriguez / Theodore Thompson2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesBrian Dipiro vs Naga Sirikonda1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAndy Powers / William Chesterfield vs Terrence Kirby / Mike Petry1-6, 6-0, 1-0
2024-09-21vs CIN A40 3.0M IRCD GuptaWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Dipiro / Adam Hunter vs Ronald Todd / Chris Ficklin7-5, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · CIN Indy 40 & Over 3.0 Men, F
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CIN A40 3.0M CRC Petry6115614142
2CIN A40 3.0M IRCD Gupta5315924184
3CIN A40 3.0M IRCD Frizzell236921151
4CIN A40 3.0M JCC Shippy133919121
5CIN A40 3.0M DCC Stuckey1561225166

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Gene Dodge
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Adam Hunter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
Andy Powers
published 3
Brian Dipiro
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.37
Bill Jerrow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Edward Bentley
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
William Chesterfield
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gene Dodge
30W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Adam Hunter
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Andy Powers
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Brian Dipiro
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Bill Jerrow
0W–12L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
83%17%<1%
2.37
Edward Bentley
1W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
William Chesterfield
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.