Teams

LCC - Smith - 6.5 Combos 18s

2026 Combo Doubles 18&Over-PB · Women 6.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-09-03vs Canebrake 18+ 6.5 ComboLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarlee Carney / Alex Arledge vs Mary Jo Goodin / Heather Moss3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAly Smith / Mary Carole Kiewit vs JULIE BAUGH / Paige Sobiesk2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJessica Campbell / Jillian Taylor vs Sonya Woodard / Paula Morris6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-08-20vs Vance-18+ 6.5 ComboLost 12
L#1 DoublesAly Smith / Mary Carole Kiewit vs Kelly Rounsaville / Melissa McDaniel5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMarlee Carney / Sarah Bolton vs Annette Foreman / Hollie Parker6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKendall Simoneau / Jillian Taylor vs Ashley Vance / Kaitlyn Oswalt4-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Marlee Carney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.08
Mary Carole Kiewit
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.07
Rebecca Benson
published
3.02
Dani Harris
published 3.5
2.94
Kendall Simoneau
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Sarah Bolton
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.84
Aly Smith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.76
Jillian Taylor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Carole Kiewit + Aly Smith5351% games+3.1% vs expected
Aly Smith + Marlee Carney2543% games+1.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marlee Carney
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
3.18
Mary Carole Kiewit
16W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.08
Rebecca Benson
1W–10L career · no lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.07
3.5
Dani Harris
1W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.02
Kendall Simoneau
11W–36L career · 1 line in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.94
Sarah Bolton
54W–44L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Aly Smith
18W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
2.84
Jillian Taylor
0W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
2.76

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.