Teams

UPTA18C/Ellison/GCC

2025 UPTA Combo 18 & Over - SC · 18+ Combo Women - 6.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-02vs UPTA18C/McGrath/ThornbladeWon 21
L#1 DoublesAmanda Jones / Erin Piepkow vs Melanie Cabaniss / Laura Garrett6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCatherine Wrenn Gibellino / Joanna Bragdon vs Sena Claxton / Carlin Turner6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesM Christine von Wyl / Ann Ellison vs Angela Joffe / Melanie Brake6-1, 6-1
2025-08-19vs UPTA18C/Murillo-Rood/CardinalWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoanna Bragdon / Andrea Phillips vs Andrea Murillo / Kellar Rogers6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTracy O'Shea / Sherwood Cobb vs Kimberly Pearigen / Jessica Heller6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Hendrix / Susanne Norwood vs Catherine Murry / Kyra Roberts1-6, 2-6
2025-08-12vs UPTA18C/Spivey/Holly TreeWon 21
W#1 DoublesBetsy Norwood / Ali Hill vs Blair Brading / Holli Mayher6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRhonda Jackson / Jamie Bach vs Jeania Smith / Alicia Walters6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesClaire Davis / Shely Landrum vs Jennifer Aughtry / Michelle Begin5-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18+ Combo Women - 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Catherine Wrenn Gibellino
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Elizabeth Philmon
published
3.27
Andrea Phillips
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Joanna Bragdon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
M Christine von Wyl
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Kristen Patel
published
3.11
Betsy Norwood
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Laura Whitney
published
3.06
Kate Gilreath
published
3.06
Shely Landrum
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Jamie Bach
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.98
Tracy O'Shea
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Erin Piepkow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Whitney Blum
published
2.87
Ann Ellison
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.83
Sherwood Cobb
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Lauren Demosthenes
published
2.57
Susanne Norwood
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Elizabeth Hendrix
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joanna Bragdon + Kristen Patel8078% games+20.9% vs expected
Jamie Bach + Kristen Patel7753% games+5.0% vs expected
Kate Gilreath + Betsy Norwood2444% games+2.9% vs expected
Erin Piepkow + Joanna Bragdon5254% games+2.6% vs expected
Whitney Blum + Kristen Patel3258% games−1.2% vs expected
Sherwood Cobb + Ann Ellison2542% games−5.2% vs expected
Ann Ellison + Erin Piepkow3253% gamesnot enough data
Sherwood Cobb + Betsy Norwood224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Catherine Wrenn Gibellino
21W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Elizabeth Philmon
17W–17L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Andrea Phillips
15W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Joanna Bragdon
27W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.19
M Christine von Wyl
23W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.13
Kristen Patel
46W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.12
3.5
Betsy Norwood
17W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Laura Whitney
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.09
Kate Gilreath
10W–16L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
Shely Landrum
26W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
Jamie Bach
39W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
Tracy O'Shea
39W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Erin Piepkow
18W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
Whitney Blum
29W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
3.5
Ann Ellison
20W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
83%17%<1%
2.87
Sherwood Cobb
14W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Lauren Demosthenes
22W–30L career · no lines in 2025
0%5%95%
2.73
Susanne Norwood
3W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.57
Elizabeth Hendrix
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.