Teams

WI Adult 18&O 3.5 W GML Brookfield East Pletcher

2023 WI Adult 18 & Over · WI Adult 18 & Over 3.5 (Eve) Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.36 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesKathleen Tereshchenko / Andrea Rowe vs Margret Oolders / Jeanne Main3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNatalie McCann vs Karen Lucey7-5, 2-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Wilcox / Kathie Chvojicek vs Julie Rupnow / Jenny Anderson6-2, 6-3
L#1 DoublesKathleen Tereshchenko / Jennifer Wilcox vs Kristin Joyce / Deanna Day4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesNatalie McCann vs Elizabeth Lindquist6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAndrea Rowe / Becky Murray vs Heidi Rozman / Jill Fitzgerald2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAnjali Sharma / Gertrude Mihalovich Pletcher vs Kelly Hofbauer / Amy Marshall6-7, 4-6
L#1 DoublesAndrea Rowe / Anjali Sharma vs Amy Drewicz / Lauren Wieloch2-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesNatalie McCann vs Colleen Hutt4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathie Chvojicek / Jennifer Wilcox vs Vicky Schaechterle / Susan Schmidt6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGertrude Mihalovich Pletcher / Becky Murray vs Angela Simon / Carrie Banda3-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesCassandra Johnson / Andrea Rowe vs Laurie Pasternak / Karen Parks6-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesNatalie McCann vs Audrey Johnson7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Wilcox / Kathleen Tereshchenko vs Anne Daniels / Katy Matola3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesAnjali Sharma vs Kristin Marlier1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGertrude Mihalovich Pletcher / Kathie Chvojicek vs Megan Hambrook / Carol Mooren6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesKathie Chvojicek / Kathleen Tereshchenko vs Gabrielle Hendrix / Brigitte Potter3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAnjali Sharma vs Katie Schultz3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesCara Buchanan vs Kristi Luzar6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesArlene Adams / Gertrude Mihalovich Pletcher vs Carrie Burkham / Tanya Kotar1-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesAndrea Rowe / Kathleen Tereshchenko vs Rita Lukey / Jennifer Turzenski4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Wilcox / Kathie Chvojicek vs Elaine Sellenheim / Danielle Winchell4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesArlene Adams / Cara Buchanan vs Kimberly Beres / Rachel Hockemeyer2-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesAndrea Rowe / Cassandra Johnson vs Laura Barker / Pam Taugher6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKathie Chvojicek / Becky Murray vs Jae Myers / Jody Kopetsky0-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesAnjali Sharma vs Julia Stacey6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCara Buchanan / Jennifer Wilcox vs Deborah Pranke / Chris Tiahnybik3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 DoublesKathleen Tereshchenko / Andrea Rowe vs Julie Haeger / Katie Kennedy6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNatalie McCann vs Alyssa Markuson6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKathie Chvojicek / Cara Buchanan vs Susan Giroux / Jennifer Hale5-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesAnjali Sharma vs Susan Schmidt6-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings19 teams · WI Adult 18 & Over 3.5 (Eve) Women
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Andrea Rowe
usually #1 Doubles 92%, also #2 Doubles 8% · published 4
3.59
Anjali Sharma
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.33
Natalie McCann
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
Cara Buchanan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.05
Kathie Chvojicek
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
2.98
Sue Connor
published
Becky Murray
published 3
Gertrude Mihalovich Pletcher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.37
Arlene Adams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Amy Richmond
published
Jennifer Wilcox
published
Kathleen Tereshchenko
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Rowe + Kathie Chvojicek81845% games−2.0% vs expected
Arlene Adams + Amy Richmond3843% games−9.2% vs expected
Kathleen Tereshchenko + Andrea Rowe0536% games−15.1% vs expected
Kathleen Tereshchenko + Kathie Chvojicek134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrea Rowe
83W–98L career · 12 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Anjali Sharma
51W–42L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%25%75%
3.59
Natalie McCann
13W–11L career · 9 lines in 2023
91%9%<1%
3.33
3.5
Cara Buchanan
41W–32L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Kathie Chvojicek
38W–88L career · 7 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.05
Sue Connor
5W–12L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
2.98
3
Becky Murray
14W–26L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Gertrude Mihalovich Pletcher
3W–23L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Arlene Adams
59W–121L career · 2 lines in 2023
84%16%<1%
2.37
Amy Richmond
42W–33L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Wilcox
22W–21L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathleen Tereshchenko
24W–27L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.