Teams

TCU SCHNEIDER GREEN

2026 FW Lone Star League · Fall Social Lone Star

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Fall Social Lone Star have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.32 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.54
Amina Dewolfe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.50
Miriah Schneider
published
2.32
Ambree Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.27
Rebecca DeLuca
published
Alyssa Honer
published 2.5
2.19
Natalie Reay
published
2.08
Taylor Teagarden
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Miriah Schneider + Ambree Smith033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Amina Dewolfe
19W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
0%38%62%
2.54
Miriah Schneider
23W–34L career · no lines in 2026
0%49%51%
2.50
2.5
Ambree Smith
18W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.32
Rebecca DeLuca
4W–1L career · no lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Alyssa Honer
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Natalie Reay
6W–13L career · no lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Taylor Teagarden
6W–8L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.