Teams

TAmos/VSofarelli (Weddington)

2022 Singles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-26vs KDay (OPRC )Split 11
L#1 SinglesJamie Zarambo vs Anne Schmitt2-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesVictoria Sofarelli vs Caroleen Towery4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-07-18vs VTolson (Firethorne)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesPatricia Cosmo McCorkle vs Viki Tolson2-6, 6-7
2022-07-18vs TBlankenship (PCC)Won 10
W#3 SinglesJamie Zarambo vs Meg McSherry6-4, 6-2
2022-06-29vs KCurley (Raintree)Split 11
W#1 SinglesVictoria Sofarelli vs Kimberlee Curley7-5, 6-1
L#3 SinglesJamie Zarambo vs Vicky Shannon4-6, 3-6
2022-06-22Won 10
W#2 SinglesVictoria Sofarelli vs Victoria Miller3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-06-15vs WRossi (Blakeney)Won 10
W#3 SinglesVictoria Sofarelli vs Maria del Mar Vazquez7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2022-06-01vs KDay (OPRC )Won 10
W#3 SinglesPatricia Cosmo McCorkle vs Caroleen Towery6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Victoria Sofarelli
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
3.06
Jamie Zarambo
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Rhonda Tate
published
2.84
Renata Riechelmann
published
2.73
Tasha Cooper
published
2.72
Olivia Day
published
2.71
Patricia Cosmo McCorkle
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.23
Tracy Amos
published
Jeri Zangmeister
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia Cosmo McCorkle + Victoria Sofarelli4259% gamesnot enough data
Victoria Sofarelli + Jamie Zarambo224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Victoria Sofarelli
171W–83L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%32%68%
3.06
3.5
Jamie Zarambo
84W–93L career · 3 lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.06
Rhonda Tate
45W–26L career · no lines in 2022
<1%35%65%
3.05
Renata Riechelmann
24W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
2.84
Tasha Cooper
13W–15L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Olivia Day
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Patricia Cosmo McCorkle
51W–67L career · 2 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.71
Tracy Amos
16W–16L career · no lines in 2022
0%98%2%
2.23
Jeri Zangmeister
10W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.