Teams

Psacharopoulos - Congressional

2025 Montgomery Doubles Fall Women · Montgomery Doubles Fall 4.0 Women

19 players · average NTRP 3.92 / MARYLAND

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Montgomery Doubles Fall 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Carolyn Ridgway
published 4
3.94
Lauren Johnston
published
3.84
Ann Fowler
published 4
3.83
Kimberly Ocampo
published
3.83
Corey Weible
published 4
3.78
JEAN HARVEY
published 4
3.78
Natalie Smith
published
3.77
Lisa Kanter
published
3.77
Teresa Figgs
published
3.71
Haas Wallace
published 4
3.60
Kary Magruder
published
3.57
Lynda Suffoletta
published
3.56
3.55
Lori Clogg
published
3.54
Melanie Caudron
published
3.48
PAMELA BOLAND
published
Meghan Bracewell
published
Shivani Gupta
published
Susan Parkinson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Clogg + Kary Magruder123 matchesnot enough data
Carolyn Ridgway + Haas Wallace123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carolyn Ridgway
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.97
Lauren Johnston
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Ann Fowler
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.84
Kimberly Ocampo
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Corey Weible
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.83
4
JEAN HARVEY
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.78
Natalie Smith
49W–31L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.78
Lisa Kanter
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Teresa Figgs
6W–0L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Haas Wallace
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.71
Kary Magruder
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.60
Lynda Suffoletta
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Erika Psacharopoulos
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.56
Lori Clogg
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.55
Melanie Caudron
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
PAMELA BOLAND
27W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
Meghan Bracewell
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shivani Gupta
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Parkinson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.