Teams

3.5 PAS AranZims W18F

2024 FALL Adult 18 & Over - CAZ · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / CENTRAL ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-11-30vs 3.5 SurpriseSimplySmashing W18FLost 14
L#1 DoublesJennifer Stogner / Muriel Aranzaens vs Pamela Kinney / Dawn Ferro6-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesTevia Wall vs Luz Melito6-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesTiffany Powers / Marlene Zwolenik vs Heidi Hoffer / Cherie Bruggeman7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAngelique Ford vs Ingrid van Hofwegen0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEmilie Wells / Heather Zimmer vs Beth Elwell / Yolanda Velasco6-7, 3-5
2023-11-20vs 3.5 WIG Smith W18FLost 23
L#1 DoublesJennifer Stogner / Marlene Zwolenik vs Nora Swift / Stefanie Jones6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesTevia Wall vs Jennifer Elliott6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesVERONICA FIELDS / Deanna Scott vs Kelly Tinucci / Debbie Long0-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesAngelique Ford vs Ruby OHayre2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesEmilie Wells / Suzanne James vs Jen Arntzen / Angeline Haase7-6, 6-2
2023-11-16vs 3.5 Wigwam Winos W18FLost 13
L#1 DoublesTerri Sakata / Emilie Wells vs Shelly Ramsey / Kimberly Johnson2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJaimie Nelson vs Alissa Harrigan2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDanielle Jenson / Tiffany Powers vs Kami Mooth / Joy Benson1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDeanna Scott / Patricia Reicks vs Therese Steele / Ellen Baker6-1, 6-0
2023-10-26vs 3.5 ARR Foley W18FWon 31
L#1 DoublesJennifer Stogner / Muriel Aranzaens vs Jami Gamez / Jill Leonetti1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesTevia Wall vs Angelica Berry3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPatricia Reicks / Deanna Scott vs Linda James / Monica Shumway6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesHeather Zimmer / Jaimie Nelson vs Valerie Foley / Michelle Dias6-1, 6-3
2023-10-19vs 3.5 SurpriseSimplySmashing W18FLost 05
L#1 DoublesMarlene Zwolenik / Jennifer Stogner vs Pamela Kinney / Dawn Ferro4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJaimie Nelson vs Luz Melito2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDeanna Scott / Muriel Aranzaens vs Lisa Schreiber / Angie Brown2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAngelique Ford vs Ingrid van Hofwegen2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesHeather Zimmer / Suzanne James vs Susan Lewis / Yolanda Jackson1-6, 0-6
2023-10-12vs 3.5 Wigwam Winos W18FWon 31
W#1 DoublesTerri Sakata / Muriel Aranzaens vs Cynthia Duncan / Kristina Werner3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTevia Wall vs Tracy Bateman6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Stogner / Marlene Zwolenik vs Therese Steele / Joy Benson6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAngelique Ford / Danielle Jenson vs Kami Mooth / Lori Ploetner6-7, 6-7
2023-10-05vs 3.5 WIG Smith W18FWon 32
L#1 DoublesTerri Sakata / Patricia Reicks vs Kathy Dutridge / Kelly Tinucci1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesTevia Wall vs Nora Swift5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMarlene Zwolenik / Muriel Aranzaens vs Jen Arntzen / Maria Sambito6-2, 7-6
W#2 SinglesVERONICA FIELDS vs Angeline Haase6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesTiffany Powers / Danielle Jenson vs Debbie Long / Sandra Roca1-6, 2-6
2023-09-21vs 3.5 ARR Foley W18FWon 21
W#1 DoublesVERONICA FIELDS / Terri Sakata vs Jami Gamez / Jill Leonetti6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesTiffany Powers / Deanna Scott vs Amy Engerholm / Krysti Horwitz6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHeather Zimmer / Suzanne James vs Tania Bennett / Sladjana Szemerei5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FALL 3.5 KIW Sweet Shots W18F111461439422
23.5 PTC MorelandWilson W18F93411951436
33.5 PHO Triplett W18F84362459498
43.5 WIG Smith W18F62301026279
53.5 SurpriseSimplySmashing W18F62261431297
63.5 VDCR Villagers W18F66283273552
73.5 PTC Jaquess W18F57253574533
83.5 PAS AranZims W18F44202046350
93.5 ARR Foley W18F26132759406
103.5 Wigwam Winos W18F26112960425
113.5 CTC Chandler Chix W18F210243679584
123.5 OCO Hot Aces W18F1111050105673

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Marlene Zwolenik
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.32
VERONICA FIELDS
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.25
Deanna Scott
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.23
Emilie Wells
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Jennifer Stogner
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.20
Heather Zimmer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Tevia Wall
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.11
Jaimie Nelson
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Tiffany Powers
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.04
Danielle Jenson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Terri Sakata
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.02
Angelique Ford
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Singles 23% · published 3.5
Muriel Aranzaens
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Patricia Reicks
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Suzanne James
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

VERONICA FIELDS + Terri Sakata6553% games+13.0% vs expected
Emilie Wells + Heather Zimmer9453% games+9.8% vs expected
Emilie Wells + Muriel Aranzaens4451% games+4.8% vs expected
Marlene Zwolenik + Jennifer Stogner201354% games+3.6% vs expected
Jennifer Stogner + Muriel Aranzaens5656% games+3.1% vs expected
Marlene Zwolenik + Muriel Aranzaens3350% games+1.9% vs expected
Danielle Jenson + Tiffany Powers42237% games−3.1% vs expected
Suzanne James + Heather Zimmer10952% games−3.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marlene Zwolenik
125W–79L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.47
VERONICA FIELDS
150W–113L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Deanna Scott
70W–78L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Emilie Wells
53W–34L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
Jennifer Stogner
94W–90L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Heather Zimmer
204W–251L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
Tevia Wall
80W–84L career · 5 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Jaimie Nelson
96W–122L career · 3 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.11
Tiffany Powers
39W–87L career · 4 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Danielle Jenson
33W–69L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.04
Terri Sakata
107W–165L career · 9 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.03
3.5
Angelique Ford
81W–52L career · 13 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.02
Muriel Aranzaens
54W–58L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Patricia Reicks
80W–62L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Suzanne James
117W–155L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.