Teams

Ti.Santospago40C

2024 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 7.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-11vs Ke.Townsend40CLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristy Team / Kellie Chesson vs Gillian Sellick / Camille Conzola1-6, 3-6
2024-10-10vs Su.Knowles40CLost 01
L#3 DoublesChristy Team / Kellie Chesson vs Mary Margaret Patton / Suzanne Wagner4-6, 3-6
2024-10-04vs Je.McIntyre40CLost 02
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Wolborsky / Kristin Rice vs Kathryn Gerber / Denise Turner7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBarbara Callahan / Christy Team vs Anne Elizabeth Harrell / Kate Whitney2-6, 1-6
2024-09-06vs Me.Tharrington40CLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristy Team / Kellie Chesson vs Amanda Williams / Jeanie White6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2024-08-23vs Ki.Patrey40C7.5Split 11
L#2 DoublesChristy Team / Kellie Chesson vs Keisha Price / April Bazin5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Wolborsky / Beth Rives vs Angela Baxley / Catherine Taylor6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2024-08-17vs Je.McIntyre40CLost 02
L#2 DoublesChristy Team / Sarah Bell vs Julie Sullivan / Tyler Cunningham3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesTina Santospago / Beth Rives vs Jessica McIntyre / Dale Roane7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2024-08-16vs Ke.Townsend40CLost 02
L#1 DoublesKristin Rice / Tina Santospago vs Sarah Shelby / Camille Conzola5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChristy Team / Cara Kuremsky vs Meghan Rider / Vanese Clough1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Kristin Rice
published
3.41
Christy Team
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.32
Beth Rives
published 3.5
3.20
Jacqueline Wolborsky
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Cara Kuremsky
published 3.5
3.07
Kellie Chesson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.73
Tina Santospago
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christy Team + Kellie Chesson422159% games+11.1% vs expected
Jacqueline Wolborsky + Tina Santospago6450% gamesnot enough data
Tina Santospago + Kellie Chesson0536% gamesnot enough data
Tina Santospago + Christy Team224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Rice
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.51
4
Christy Team
150W–90L career · 7 lines in 2024
75%25%<1%
3.41
3.5
Beth Rives
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Jacqueline Wolborsky
66W–46L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Cara Kuremsky
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Kellie Chesson
107W–119L career · 6 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Tina Santospago
51W–74L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.