Teams

15 Salisbury Diel KT

2022 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.92 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-06-04vs 7 ACAC Jackson/TickleLost 01
L#2 DoublesKimberly Means / Jennifer Burns vs Kristin Lemon / Toosdhi Jackson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-04-30vs 18 WOCC PurcellWon 10
W#1 SinglesJennifer Burns vs Alex Driscoll6-4, 6-4
2022-04-23Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJennifer Burns vs Jen Waller2-6, 4-6
2022-04-16vs 10 Bon Air MossLost 01
L#1 DoublesKimberly Means / Jennifer Burns vs Shelli Fenstermacher / Jennifer Moss1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Emily McClenny
published 3.5
3.10
2.88
Tracy Diel
published
2.87
BRANDY NICKEL
published 3
2.86
Kimberly Means
published
Aimee Collins
published 3
2.49
Kenica Eggan
published
2.36
Christina Sursa
published 2.5
Jennifer Burns
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Kimberly Stembridge
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Colleen Quattlebaum + BRANDY NICKEL123 matchesnot enough data
Tracy Diel + BRANDY NICKEL123 matchesnot enough data
BRANDY NICKEL + Emily McClenny213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Emily McClenny
30W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%60%40%
3.47
3
Colleen Quattlebaum
27W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%23%77%
3.10
Tracy Diel
9W–12L career · no lines in 2022
82%18%<1%
2.88
3
BRANDY NICKEL
24W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
2.87
Kimberly Means
9W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Aimee Collins
12W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kenica Eggan
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
2.49
2.5
Christina Sursa
2W–12L career · no lines in 2022
0%86%14%
2.36
2.5
Jennifer Burns
2W–14L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kimberly Stembridge
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.