Teams

Unrein - Riverside

2023 KS 18 & Over Adult Outdoor League · 4.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / KANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-06-29vs KS/Whitmer/Jones/18&Over4.5MWon 21
W#1 DoublesChad Unrein / Shivraj Patil vs Steven Wegner / Matt Becker0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKurush Tavadia / James Tomlin vs Mitchel Whitmer / Dylan Jones4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesAdam Gray vs Charles Nolan6-3, 6-4
2023-06-24vs KS/Whitmer/Jones/18&Over4.5MSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChad Unrein / Kurush Tavadia vs Steven Wegner / Dylan Jones3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAdam Gray vs Brandon Hadwiger6-4, 6-4
2023-06-24vs KS/Whitmer/Jones/18&Over4.5MSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBen McCouch / Chad Unrein vs Max Pyle / Grant Ringler7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAdam Gray vs Steven Wegner6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJames Tomlin / Kurush Tavadia vs Frank Reyes / Mitchel Whitmer4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 SinglesShivraj Patil vs Tanner Cluck6-1, 6-2
2023-06-15vs KS/Whitmer/Jones/18&Over4.5MLost 13
L#1 DoublesJoel Phelps / Chad Unrein vs Brandon Hadwiger / Grant Ringler5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAdam Gray vs Mitchel Whitmer6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBen McCouch / James Tomlin vs Frank Reyes / Matt Becker3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJames Wiggins / Kurush Tavadia vs Steven Wegner / Charles Nolan3-6, 2-6
2023-06-10vs KS/Whitmer/Jones/18&Over4.5MLost 14
L#1 DoublesShivraj Patil / Joel Phelps vs Brandon Hadwiger / Steven Wegner6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAdam Gray vs Matt Becker4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesZach Loomis / James Wiggins vs Max Pyle / Mitchel Whitmer7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesChad Unrein vs Dennis Matzen4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLong Pham / Ben McCouch vs Dylan Jones / Charles Nolan3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-06-10vs KS/Whitmer/Jones/18&Over4.5MLost 13
L#1 DoublesBen McCouch / Long Pham vs Matt Becker / Dennis Matzen3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesShivraj Patil vs Steven Wegner2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesZach Loomis / James Wiggins vs Brandon Hadwiger / Max Pyle3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChad Unrein / Joel Phelps vs Tanner Cluck / Ryan Wolfe6-0, 6-1
2023-06-01vs KS/Whitmer/Jones/18&Over4.5MLost 13
L#1 DoublesChad Unrein / Zach Loomis vs Steven Wegner / Brandon Hadwiger3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAdam Gray vs Matt Becker7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLong Pham / James Tomlin vs Frank Reyes / Dennis Matzen7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesShivraj Patil vs Lance Henne6-7, 4-6
2023-05-18vs KS/Whitmer/Jones/18&Over4.5MSplit 22
W#1 DoublesZach Loomis / Chad Unrein vs Grant Ringler / Max Pyle3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAdam Gray vs Lance Henne6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLong Pham / Ben McCouch vs Frank Reyes / Matt Becker6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJames Wiggins / Kurush Tavadia vs Dylan Jones / Charles Nolan4-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KS/Whitmer/Jones/18&Over4.5M62261440361
2Unrein - Riverside26142657398

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.99 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Adam Gray
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #2 Singles 14% · published 4.5
4.17
James Wiggins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.10
Ben McCouch
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.10
Zach Loomis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.10
Chad Unrein
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 13% · published 4.5
3.75
Kurush Tavadia
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.71
Shivraj Patil
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Ian Clifton
published
James Tomlin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Joel Phelps
published
Long Pham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chad Unrein + Ben McCouch2450% games−3.0% vs expected
Long Pham + Ben McCouch7361% games−3.8% vs expected
James Wiggins + Kurush Tavadia4247% games−5.6% vs expected
Kurush Tavadia + Chad Unrein224 matchesnot enough data
Chad Unrein + Zach Loomis314 matchesnot enough data
Shivraj Patil + Chad Unrein303 matchesnot enough data
Chad Unrein + Long Pham303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Adam Gray
9W–2L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
James Wiggins
24W–11L career · 4 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
4.17
4.5
Ben McCouch
21W–23L career · 5 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
4.10
Zach Loomis
47W–19L career · 4 lines in 2023
23%76%<1%
4.10
4.5
Chad Unrein
65W–34L career · 8 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
4.10
Kurush Tavadia
22W–14L career · 8 lines in 2023
97%3%<1%
3.75
Shivraj Patil
29W–16L career · 5 lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
3.71
Ian Clifton
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
James Tomlin
2W–9L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Joel Phelps
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Long Pham
52W–21L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.