Teams

Jones - Happy Feet

2025 Montgomery Combo Fall · Montgomery Combo Fall 7.5 Women

20 players · average NTRP 3.69 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-12-20vs Opar - Hit Me with Your Best ShotWon 10
W#2 DoublesSanghee Lee / GENA CHUNG vs Janet Opar / Tana Jankowiak6-4, 6-4
2025-12-13vs RubinoLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnto Faini / Tina Halley vs Mel Barrett / Kasey Kinney4-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesMichele Bloom / Wendy Beale vs Katherine Fluharty / Jennifer Ivester3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesParu Rellan / GENA CHUNG vs Regina Farrington / Sarah Newhall6-3, 6-1
2025-11-22vs RubinoLost 01
L#2 DoublesGENA CHUNG / Tricia Muneses vs Ruxandra Badiu / Tria Thalman5-7, 3-6
2025-11-13vs Hazel - DROP IT LIKE IT'S HOTWon 20
W#1 DoublesTina Halley / Wendy Beale vs Cora Ho / Alina Limpert6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKaren Jones / Anto Faini vs Jayne Korolkoff / Polyxena Speros6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJulia Latein-Kimmig / GENA CHUNG vs Wenxi Li / Carmen Scurato5-7, 1-6
2025-10-23vs RubinoLost 02
L#1 DoublesTina Halley / Sandy Thongphok vs Kasey Kinney / Zoie Acadia2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMeaghan Curry / Wendy Beale vs Noelle Lynch / Heather Schreiber4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-10-18vs Hazel - DROP IT LIKE IT'S HOTWon 20
W#1 DoublesJelena Mitrovic / Anto Faini vs Leticia Romero Maineri / Michelyn Boyd6-0, 7-6
W#3 DoublesTina Halley / Sheila O'Connell vs Jayne Korolkoff / Polyxena Speros6-3, 6-2
2025-10-10vs Opar - Hit Me with Your Best ShotLost 01
L#3 DoublesLinda Shaffer / Sandy Thongphok vs Katherine Dodson / Alexis McCary6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesYunden Jinsmaa / Anto Faini vs Ellen Lee / Diana Talesnick6-2, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Combo Fall 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Tina Halley
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.81
Paru Rellan
published
3.77
Evelyn Chan
published
3.72
Michele Bloom
published
3.68
Cathy Robertson
published 4
3.68
Jelena Mitrovic
published
3.67
Desiree Drakakis
published 4
3.66
Anto Faini
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.62
Tricia Muneses
published
3.56
Sandy Thongphok
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.55
Jennifer Yang
published
3.55
Meaghan Curry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.50
Sanghee Lee
published
3.47
Wendy Beale
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.44
Yunden Jinsmaa
published
3.42
Sheila O'Connell
published
3.32
Julia Latein-Kimmig
published
3.29
GENA CHUNG
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Linda Shaffer
published
Karen Jones
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sanghee Lee + Tricia Muneses4170% games+4.0% vs expected
Jennifer Yang + Anto Faini4159% games−0.3% vs expected
Sandy Thongphok + Anto Faini131152% games−1.5% vs expected
Meaghan Curry + Sandy Thongphok404 matchesnot enough data
Sandy Thongphok + Jelena Mitrovic314 matchesnot enough data
GENA CHUNG + Sanghee Lee123 matchesnot enough data
Wendy Beale + Sandy Thongphok213 matchesnot enough data
Tina Halley + Sandy Thongphok123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tina Halley
128W–66L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
Paru Rellan
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Evelyn Chan
22W–13L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Michele Bloom
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Cathy Robertson
16W–18L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Jelena Mitrovic
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Desiree Drakakis
20W–22L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
3.5
Anto Faini
226W–104L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.66
Tricia Muneses
43W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.62
3.5
Sandy Thongphok
276W–124L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.56
Jennifer Yang
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
3.5
Meaghan Curry
84W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.55
Sanghee Lee
37W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Wendy Beale
315W–200L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
Yunden Jinsmaa
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.44
Sheila O'Connell
23W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%27%
3.42
Julia Latein-Kimmig
14W–19L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
GENA CHUNG
122W–130L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Linda Shaffer
18W–17L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Karen Jones
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.