Teams

YMCA Smash Hitts

2022 40 & Over Fall Women - NA · 4.0 Thursday

12 players · average NTRP 3.90 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-11-17vs Blossom Pichot ThursdayWon 10
W#2 DoublesCandice Hitt / Jeanie Szmanda vs Lindsay Barton / Janie Stewart6-2, 6-1
2022-10-27vs JCC NinasWon 10
W#2 DoublesKimberley Smith / Jeanie Szmanda vs Nancy Almaraz / Casey Herridge7-6, 7-6
2022-10-13vs FOR Body ShotsWon 10
W#3 DoublesMartha Bartlett / Jeanie Szmanda vs Elaine Covert / Patsy Padron6-3, 6-1
2022-10-06vs JNCC RacquettesLost 01
L#1 DoublesTalat Shah / Jeanie Szmanda vs Tiffany May / Brenda Volpe1-6, 5-7
2022-09-15vs Shavano Midlife BitersWon 10
W#2 DoublesKimberley Smith / Jeanie Szmanda vs Christine Schenk / Alicia Solis6-3, 7-5
2022-09-08vs Alamo Heights Jack AcesWon 10
W#4 DoublesJeanie Szmanda / Talat Shah vs Emily Foster / Chaney Stuart2-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
3.71
Brook Harris
published 4
3.65
Margaret Neiheisel
published
3.62
Candice Hitt
published 4
3.60
Jill Hurd
published
3.59
Claudia Palacios
published 4
3.57
Jill Briggs
published
3.56
Martha Bartlett
published
3.37
Terry Holcomb
published
3.17
Talat Shah
published
3.10
Jeanie Szmanda
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Jane Pelley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Briggs + Jill Hurd3646% games+1.2% vs expected
Alejandra Perales + Claudia Palacios4446% games−8.0% vs expected
Jill Briggs + Brook Harris123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alejandra Perales
17W–13L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Brook Harris
12W–19L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.71
Margaret Neiheisel
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Candice Hitt
6W–11L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.62
Jill Hurd
10W–20L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.60
4
Claudia Palacios
4W–4L career · type A · no lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
3.59
Jill Briggs
20W–23L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
Martha Bartlett
4W–14L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
Terry Holcomb
8W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.37
Talat Shah
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Jeanie Szmanda
78W–66L career · 6 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10
Jane Pelley
1W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.