Teams

Kau Belles

2022 Montgomery Adult 18 & Over Spring · Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.56 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2022-06-22vs ThomasWon 20
W#1 DoublesZoie Acadia / Brenda Kaechele vs Shelley Moeller / Terri Kim6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRona Birnbaum / Gay Trinkner vs Valentina di Francesco / Sarah Thomas6-2, 6-4
2022-06-15vs BreslerWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrenda Kaechele / Zoie Acadia vs Karina Guisande / Sandy Thongphok6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Jones / Gay Trinkner vs Karina Perez / Miki Reed6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesXenia Baranova vs Linda Shaffer6-0, 6-1
2022-06-09vs Chevy Chase ChargersWon 40
W#1 DoublesZoie Acadia / Brenda Kaechele vs Christelle LaPolice / Marie Kelly6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesYulan Jin vs Monica Brenneman6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMihaela Pertea / Karen Jones vs Li Ives / Shirley Sagawa6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesXenia Baranova vs Shari Gronvall6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2022-06-03vs ThomasWon 30
W#1 DoublesMihaela Pertea / Karen Jones vs Fran Murphy / Valentina di Francesco6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesGay Trinkner / Rona Birnbaum vs Nancy Davis / Courtney McDonald6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesPrashila Dullabh vs Justine Handelman3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-05-25vs BreslerSplit 11
L#1 SinglesXenia Baranova vs Jelena Mitrovic1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesZoie Acadia / Brenda Kaechele vs Miki Reed / Nikki Eyman6-1, 6-3
2022-05-21Won 20
W#1 SinglesYulan Jin vs Terri Kim6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesPrashila Dullabh vs Michaela Pacesova6-0, 6-1
2022-05-17vs Chevy Chase ChargersWon 31
W#1 DoublesZoie Acadia / Brenda Kaechele vs Christelle LaPolice / Shirley Sagawa6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMihaela Pertea / Megan Wilhelm vs Carrie Wofford / Elizabeth Seibel6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesGay Trinkner vs Shari Gronvall3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAlice Kau / Xenia Baranova vs Alison Curtis / Elizabeth McLeod6-3, 6-7
2022-05-12vs BreslerWon 21
W#1 SinglesXenia Baranova vs Anto Faini6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMihaela Pertea / Karen Jones vs Sandy Thongphok / Mariechen Bresler6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesYulan Jin vs Jelena Mitrovic4-6, 3-6
2022-05-05vs Chevy Chase ChargersSplit 11
W#1 SinglesXenia Baranova vs Shari Gronvall6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMihaela Pertea / Rona Birnbaum vs Carrie Wofford / Li Ives0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-04-30vs ThomasSplit 11
W#1 SinglesYulan Jin vs Michaela Pacesova6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesPrashila Dullabh vs Bella Bidzhieva6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-04-18vs BreslerSplit 11
L#1 SinglesYulan Jin vs Jelena Mitrovic6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKelsey Forbes / Prashila Dullabh vs Patricia Daugherty / Fatemeh-Sarah Roth7-5, 6-4
2022-04-13vs Chevy Chase ChargersWon 30
W#1 DoublesMihaela Pertea / Megan Wilhelm vs Chung Kim / Elizabeth Seibel6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesXenia Baranova vs Annie Carey6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesGay Trinkner / Karen Jones vs Li Ives / Melinda Shayuth6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Xenia Baranova
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 4
3.85
Lucy Wang
published
3.69
Kelsey Forbes
published 4
3.65
Zoie Acadia
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.33
Yulan Jin
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
Brenda Kaechele
published 3.5
3.15
Katherine Dodson
published
3.11
Prashila Dullabh
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.08
Gay Trinkner
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.99
Margo Herron
published
2.83
Jonaki Bose
published
2.77
Mihaela Pertea
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Rona Birnbaum
published
Karen Jones
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yulan Jin + Xenia Baranova6066% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Xenia Baranova
204W–68L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%75%24%
3.91
Lucy Wang
33W–16L career · no lines in 2022
88%12%<1%
3.85
4
Kelsey Forbes
141W–114L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Zoie Acadia
359W–171L career · 10 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
3.5
Yulan Jin
237W–178L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Brenda Kaechele
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Katherine Dodson
44W–68L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
3
Prashila Dullabh
91W–60L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%20%80%
3.11
3.5
Gay Trinkner
228W–205L career · 9 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
Margo Herron
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
2.99
Jonaki Bose
12W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Mihaela Pertea
161W–149L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
Rona Birnbaum
6W–13L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
Karen Jones
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.