Teams

Volley Llamas

Spring Adult 18 & Over WeekEND · Ladies 2.5

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-06-27vs Overhead AchieversLost 12
L#1 DoublesJane Randolph / Hannah Vaughan vs Katie Shoen / Alexis Price1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesCaroline Rodgers vs Renae Meyer6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAshley Newgard / Melissa Francis vs Jeannine Kaplan / Carolyn Franklin6-4, 6-3
2026-06-20vs Alley CatsLost 03
L#1 DoublesKate Moore / Jane Randolph vs Courtney Comstock / Kristin Kercheville3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesPiper Nelson vs Taylor Carlson1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHannah Vaughan / Louise Tedford vs Missy Strittmatter / Laura Carpenter1-6, 4-6
2026-06-13vs LobstersLost 03
L#1 DoublesJane Randolph / Kate Moore vs Leslie Howard / Rachael Shimek2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesHannah Vaughan vs Theresa Tarantino6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesAlexis Martin / Louise Tedford vs Kelly Arnold / Michele Scott6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2026-06-06vs Net NinjasLost 03
L#1 DoublesCaroline Rodgers / Hannah Vaughan vs Steph Vainiunas / Bita Haidarian Nossa3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMelissa Francis vs Stephanie Helfman1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLouise Tedford / Alexis Martin vs Jill May / Heilla Lain4-6, 4-6
2026-05-30vs The IN CrowdLost 12
L#1 DoublesAshley Newgard / Caroline Rodgers vs Debi Prickette / Peggy Carrasquillo0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesPiper Nelson vs Katie Price6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHannah Vaughan / Melissa Francis vs Jennifer Lord / Laura Sykes3-6, 4-6
2026-05-25vs TNTWon 21
L#1 DoublesKate Moore / Caroline Rodgers vs Teresa Leung / Monique Zint0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesPiper Nelson vs Diana Nogle6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMelissa Francis / Louise Tedford vs Rhonda Silguero / Melissa Jung6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2026-05-23vs Rally PackWon 21
W#1 DoublesPiper Nelson / Ashley Newgard vs Kelley Mccrea / Marieke De Hoog - Fleurbaaij6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesLouise Tedford vs Bridget Yost6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesHannah Vaughan / Jane Randolph vs Summer Hoglund / Priscille Richman4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-05-16vs Sets AppealLost 03
L#1 DoublesPiper Nelson / Kate Moore vs Amanda Atkinson / Melissa Lapietra2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAshley Newgard vs Rowena Crabbe3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCaroline Rodgers / Alexis Martin vs Jan Achilles / Leena Mistry1-6, 4-6
2026-04-19vs Troop Great HillsLost 12
W#1 DoublesHannah Vaughan / Jane Randolph vs Stephanie Winfrey / Kerri Westmoreland6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAshley Newgard vs Erin Beil3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Francis / Alexis Martin vs Sooyeon Mirda / Traci Holm4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ladies 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.02 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alexis Martin
published 2.5
2.19
Ashley Newgard
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 2.5
2.13
Piper Nelson
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.10
Jane Randolph
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.08
Caroline Rodgers
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
1.99
Louise Tedford
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
1.86
Melissa Francis
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
1.81
Hannah Vaughan
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Kate Moore
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Randolph + Hannah Vaughan2436% games−3.9% vs expected
Kate Moore + Alexis Martin3347% gamesnot enough data
Caroline Rodgers + Louise Tedford224 matchesnot enough data
Jane Randolph + Caroline Rodgers213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Alexis Martin
7W–11L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Ashley Newgard
2W–7L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Piper Nelson
7W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Jane Randolph
21W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
2.5
Caroline Rodgers
9W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Louise Tedford
13W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Melissa Francis
9W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.86
Hannah Vaughan
7W–21L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.81
Kate Moore
12W–14L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.