Teams

FOR The Love of Tennis

2024 55 & Over Fall Women - NA · 7.0 Tuesday Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.43 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 7.0 Tuesday Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Kate Larimer
published
3.60
Anita Wilkinson
published 4
3.49
Tamara Naquin
published
3.39
Cheryl Lozano
published 3.5
3.34
Barbara Vance
published 3.5
3.32
Kerry Napper
published
3.29
Sharon Winter
published
3.27
Michelle Pettit
published
3.16
Sheila Gentry
published
3.10
Kelly Reeve
published
3.09
Deborah Kirker
published 3.5
3.04
Cassie Villegas
published 3.5
3.04
Gayle Land
published
2.97
Brenda Worsham
published 3
2.92
Elisa Caudill
published
2.71
Cynthia Shafer
published 3
Mallory Breen
published
Rosemary Hickey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kerry Napper + Michelle Pettit19660% games+6.1% vs expected
Sharon Winter + Cheryl Lozano10256% games+5.3% vs expected
Rosemary Hickey + Sheila Gentry3251% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Vance + Gayle Land224 matchesnot enough data
Rosemary Hickey + Barbara Vance303 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Vance + Sheila Gentry213 matchesnot enough data
Elisa Caudill + Kate Larimer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kate Larimer
25W–16L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Anita Wilkinson
14W–28L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.60
Tamara Naquin
34W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Cheryl Lozano
15W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Barbara Vance
26W–18L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
Kerry Napper
33W–21L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Sharon Winter
23W–19L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Michelle Pettit
34W–20L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Sheila Gentry
14W–12L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Kelly Reeve
9W–11L career · no lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Deborah Kirker
8W–21L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Cassie Villegas
1W–14L career · no lines in 2025
38%61%<1%
3.04
Gayle Land
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Brenda Worsham
35W–49L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Elisa Caudill
15W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Cynthia Shafer
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
Mallory Breen
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rosemary Hickey
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.