Teams

Beginners Spring Team 1

Memphis 2.0 · 2.5 Beginner's League

23 players · average NTRP 2.62 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2.5 Beginner's League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.28 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.68
Kelcie Nollner
published
2.61
2.60
Madeline Wilson
published
2.50
Caroline Moses
published 3
2.40
Shellie Eller
published
2.36
Estelle Mitchell
published 2.5
2.30
Stephen Fly
published
2.27
Julie Upchurch
published
2.27
Andre Johnson
published 2.5
Deanah Mack
published 2.5
2.23
Destiny Taylor
published 2.5
2.21
Lexi Dickerson
published
2.16
Alicia Wright
published 2.5
2.15
Surayyah Hasan
published
2.08
Parker Pippen
published
2.02
Zoe Harrison
published
2.00
Katherine Dorsett
published
1.89
Amber Pettis
published 2.5
Joshua Anderson
published
Luis Lara
published
Melanie Fant
published
Michael Finch
published
Xiangyu Yao
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelcie Nollner + Julie Upchurch13458% games+8.7% vs expected
Alicia Wright + Katherine Dorsett0632% games−15.4% vs expected
Caroline Moses + Madeline Wilson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelcie Nollner
23W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%8%92%
2.68
3
Jackie Renner Mills
7W–15L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.61
Madeline Wilson
15W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%23%77%
2.60
3
Caroline Moses
8W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
2.50
Shellie Eller
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%79%21%
2.40
2.5
Estelle Mitchell
12W–17L career · no lines in 2025
0%86%14%
2.36
Stephen Fly
7W–18L career · no lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.30
Julie Upchurch
18W–16L career · no lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Andre Johnson
6W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Deanah Mack
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Destiny Taylor
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.23
Lexi Dickerson
9W–22L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.21
2.5
Alicia Wright
4W–15L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.16
Surayyah Hasan
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.15
Parker Pippen
1W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Zoe Harrison
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Katherine Dorsett
1W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.00
2.5
Amber Pettis
1W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.89
Joshua Anderson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Luis Lara
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Melanie Fant
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Finch
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Xiangyu Yao
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.