Teams

Ahmed - Racket Rebels

2025 Howard Tri-Level · Howard Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.38 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-13vs Lippy - Tri-Volley-LlamasWon 20
W#2 DoublesJAMAL COTTMAN / Jaipaul Agonus vs Michael Maiorana / David Starsoneck6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMajed Hamawy / Milad Ebrahimi vs Patrick Hughes / Sandeep Das7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2025-08-12vs Rector - Get The Point StartedWon 20
W#1 DoublesJaipaul Agonus / JAMAL COTTMAN vs DJ Alston / Aaron Pilius6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMajed Hamawy / Milad Ebrahimi vs Abraham Hollander / UMA SRIKUMARAN6-4, 6-2
2025-08-07vs Yeesir Tri 3.0-4.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesManoj Golecha / Jaipaul Agonus vs Joe Bae / SUNG WOON SOON2-6, 1-6
2025-08-04vs Lippy - Tri-Volley-LlamasLost 01
L#1 DoublesJaipaul Agonus / Ateeq Ahmed vs Hongbo Ma / Milan Paudel4-6, 5-4
2025-07-27vs Munshell-IHT 3XLost 01
L#1 DoublesJaipaul Agonus / Ramana Regulapati vs Larry Wall / George Sybert3-6, 1-6
2025-06-18vs Munshell-IHT 3XLost 02
L#1 DoublesJaipaul Agonus / Ateeq Ahmed vs Lohiya Atluri / Maximillian Lewis3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRamana Regulapati / Majed Hamawy vs James Albert / Tim McNamara4-6, 0-6
2025-06-13vs Yeesir Tri 3.0-4.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesJaipaul Agonus / Martin Perrine vs Donggeun Sinn / Stephen Lee4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMajed Hamawy / Ramana Regulapati vs Jongchan Kim / Peter Hong7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
JAMAL COTTMAN
published 3.5
3.29
Ateeq Ahmed
published 3.5
3.20
Jaipaul Agonus
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.18
Ravichandra Muthoju
published
2.98
Majed Hamawy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.91
Juan Luis Garcia
published
2.83
Milad Ebrahimi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Majed Hamawy + JAMAL COTTMAN5255% games+11.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
JAMAL COTTMAN
18W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Ateeq Ahmed
10W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Jaipaul Agonus
52W–61L career · 7 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Ravichandra Muthoju
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.18
3
Majed Hamawy
379W–517L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
Juan Luis Garcia
18W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
2.91
Milad Ebrahimi
10W–19L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.