Teams

An.Willard18T

2023 Cap Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.0-3.5-4.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2023-07-25vs Al.Sheehan18TSplit 11
L#2 DoublesSusanne Knowles / Maureen Nixon vs Yvonne Barrow / Allison Sheehan1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesNora Stacey / Debra Hauge vs Shade Maret / Julia Kerr7-5, 6-3
2023-07-18vs Ki.Monsees18TLost 01
L#3 DoublesSarah Glover / CAROLINE FLAMANT vs Margaret Ann Gonella / Kari Knoblauch3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-07-17vs Ch.Kopp18TLost 02
L#2 DoublesHeidi Duggins / Maureen Nixon vs Amy Robinson / Anne Elizabeth Harrell3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCAROLINE FLAMANT / Debra Hauge vs Mandi Chappell / Melissa Graham2-6, 2-6
2023-06-27vs An.Jones18T3.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesNora Stacey / CAROLINE FLAMANT vs Julie Karg / Linda Blevins3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-06-22vs Na.Rodriguez18TWon 10
W#2 DoublesCAROLINE FLAMANT / Merab Puleo vs Lisa Mitalas / Kathryn Horneffer3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-06-20vs Pa.Spell18TSplit 11
L#2 DoublesHeidi Duggins / Maureen Nixon vs LUCY LAV / Leslie Wright1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesBarbara Bond / Debra Hauge vs Marilyn Slaymaker / Tara Spina6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-06-15vs An.Jones18T3.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBarbara Bond / Debra Hauge vs Julie Liddle / Jacqueline Morgan3-6, 4-6
2023-06-13vs Ki.Johnson18TLost 01
L#3 DoublesCAROLINE FLAMANT / Sarah Glover vs Caroline Fungaroli / Wendy Lindberg1-6, 1-6
2023-06-06vs Co.Shaw18TLost 01
L#3 DoublesNora Stacey / Debra Hauge vs Lindsay Gorman / Marlea Ward7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-06-01vs Ch.Waychoff18TWon 10
W#1 DoublesCAROLINE FLAMANT / Merab Puleo vs Jennifer Hall / Cristine Allison6-1, 7-6
2023-05-30vs Pa.Cochran18TLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnn Willard / Maureen Nixon vs Paula Cochran / Regina Davis2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-05-23vs De.Skiko18TWon 10
W#3 DoublesNora Stacey / CAROLINE FLAMANT vs Teri O'Neill / Kelly Huffstetler7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0-3.5-4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Cindy Faltisco
published 4
3.56
Maggie Patterson
published
3.55
Lynne Manweiler
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.53
Ginger Sluder
published
3.46
Jackie Hilbert
published
3.22
Susanne Knowles
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Ann Willard
published 3.5
3.09
Heidi Duggins
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.02
Maureen Nixon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.88
CAROLINE FLAMANT
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.85
Debra Hauge
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maureen Nixon + Heidi Duggins10654% games−0.4% vs expected
Debra Hauge + CAROLINE FLAMANT2448% gamesnot enough data
Ann Willard + Heidi Duggins2346% gamesnot enough data
Susanne Knowles + Heidi Duggins134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cindy Faltisco
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Maggie Patterson
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.56
4
Lynne Manweiler
90W–123L career · 8 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
Ginger Sluder
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.53
Jackie Hilbert
9W–24L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
Susanne Knowles
94W–122L career · 4 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Ann Willard
10W–20L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Heidi Duggins
95W–121L career · 5 lines in 2023
25%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Maureen Nixon
77W–85L career · 4 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
CAROLINE FLAMANT
49W–47L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Debra Hauge
73W–64L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%85%15%
2.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.