Teams

ETC: Czarnecki

2025 Flex Singles League - Fall · Women

1 player · average NTRP / WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-04vs ETC:FriedrichLost 01
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Czarnecki vs Ann-Kristin Friedrich4-6, 1-6
2025-03-26vs ETC:InoueWon 10
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Czarnecki vs Mika Inoue4-6, 5-2, 1-0
2025-03-09vs LTC:DeryWon 10
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Czarnecki vs Melissa Dery6-0, 6-1
2025-03-02vs LTC:TorbatyWon 10
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Czarnecki vs Mahdis Bikhof Torbaty6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ETC:Wartman000000
2ETC:Friedrich022008
3ETC:Inoue0211211
4LTC:Dery0312425
5LTC:Torbaty0303636
6ETC: Czarnecki0431324

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Elizabeth Czarnecki
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Czarnecki
10W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.