Teams

ESB:Eclipses:Samter/Neuert

2024 VT Tri-Level Women · 3.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP / VERMONT

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-12-14vs EE:Doran/DeAngelisLost 01
L#1 DoublesKate Cunningham / Nancy Kaplan vs Caitlin DeAngelis / Molly Doran5-7, 3-6
2024-12-08vs OC:Our Court Jesters:DurstinLost 01
L#1 DoublesLinda Samter / Kate Cunningham vs Lisa Durstin / Amy Dexter6-7, 1-6
2024-11-17vs ESB:Smash Hits:Wygmans/BlackmoreLost 01
L#1 DoublesNatalie Neuert / Linda Morgan-Yatzor vs Lori Roberts / Deidre Riehle3-6, 2-6
2024-11-10vs TRS:Stowe with the Flow:SchulzWon 10
W#1 DoublesLinda Morgan-Yatzor / Nancy Kaplan vs Vivianne Ivanier / Carolyn Blackman4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-10-26vs ESB:Miss Hits:StrausserLost 01
L#1 DoublesNatalie Neuert / Linda Samter vs Laura Cawley / Lisa Strausser4-6, 2-6
2024-10-20vs EE:FonsecaLost 01
L#1 DoublesLinda Morgan-Yatzor / Linda Samter vs Karen Plante / Lynn Bursell3-6, 1-6
2024-10-05vs BTC:Fun Fall Females:WimbleWon 10
W#1 DoublesNatalie Neuert / Nancy Kaplan vs Jennifer Rowling / Kristin Walsh6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ESB:Miss Hits:Strausser7070141
2ESB:Smash Hits:Wygmans/Blackmore6161239
3EE:Doran/DeAngelis4343659
4TRS:Stowe with the Flow:Schulz3434861
5OC:Our Court Jesters:Durstin34341075
6ESB:Eclipses:Samter/Neuert25251178
7BTC:Fun Fall Females:Wimble25251274
8EE:Fonseca16161271

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Kate Cunningham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Linda Morgan-Yatzor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Linda Samter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Kaplan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Natalie Neuert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Morgan-Yatzor + Natalie Neuert2648% games+4.8% vs expected
Linda Morgan-Yatzor + Linda Samter1532% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kate Cunningham
45W–24L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%21%79%
3.11
Linda Morgan-Yatzor
46W–68L career · 3 lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
3.11
Linda Samter
18W–40L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Kaplan
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Natalie Neuert
27W–26L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.