Teams

Smart Aces

2023 Montgomery Adult 18 & Over Spring · Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 4.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-22vs Moutlon-LevyLost 02
L#1 DoublesDana MacHer / Wendy Carey vs Cheryl Driscoll / Trinh Banks0-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesAnne Jagodits / Kim Miller vs Tara Jakubik / Clare Donahue2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-06-16vs Moutlon-LevyLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnne Jagodits / Kim Miller vs Lora Bacanskas / Clare Donahue5-7, 4-6
2023-06-10vs Moutlon-LevyWon 10
W#2 DoublesDana MacHer / Natalie Eatedali vs Natasha Moulton-Levy / Jennifer Nyman6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-06-06vs Moutlon-LevyLost 01
L#1 SinglesAnne Jagodits vs Tara Jakubik2-6, 2-6
2023-06-04vs Moutlon-LevyWon 20
W#1 DoublesNatalie Eatedali / Michele Brammer vs Clare Donahue / Dao Phan-Vissering6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesDana MacHer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-18vs Moutlon-LevySplit 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer McGraw / Dana MacHer vs Dao Phan-Vissering / Trinh Banks5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNatalie Eatedali / Laurie Cohen vs Margie Davis / Jennifer Nyman1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.19 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Jennifer McGraw
published
4.35
Natalie Eatedali
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.29
4.26
Simone Feldman
published
Bavi Sadayappan
published 4.5
4.23
Anne Jagodits
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.22
Melissa Mendoza
published
4.18
Dana MacHer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.18
Michele Brammer
published
4.09
Ruchi Nanda
published
4.03
Laurie Cohen
published
3.90
Kim Miller
published
Kara Stevenson
published
Katya White
published
Kerrie Jenkins
published
Wendy Carey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer McGraw + Natalie Eatedali7260% games+6.8% vs expected
Simone Feldman + Wendy Carey4256% games−3.1% vs expected
Natalie Eatedali + Laurie Cohen224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer McGraw
16W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
4.39
4.5
Natalie Eatedali
125W–47L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
4.35
4.5
Ana Maria Pena Castro
43W–24L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
4.29
Simone Feldman
79W–66L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
4.26
4.5
Bavi Sadayappan
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Anne Jagodits
208W–213L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
4.23
Melissa Mendoza
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Dana MacHer
91W–44L career · 4 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
4.18
Michele Brammer
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
4.18
Ruchi Nanda
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
4.09
Laurie Cohen
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
4.03
Kim Miller
42W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.90
Kara Stevenson
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Katya White
27W–33L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kerrie Jenkins
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Wendy Carey
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.