Teams

Southern: WTC: Shadow Strikers 18+ 3.0 M

2026 18&Over Men · 3.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.06 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-14vs SMC Sinner's Swing 18+ 3.0MWon 40
W#1 DoublesIvan Martinez / Daniel Hopemark vs William Friedman / Charley Riggs7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJianming Kang vs Larry Hoffman6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAnbo Zhou / Frank Huang vs Bill Wong / Wayde Gilston6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesHarry Kim vs Bruce Gold6-1, 6-2
2026-07-07vs Torview Evolution Tennis 18+ 3.0MWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Zinger / Daniel Harrigan vs Ralph Carter / Adam Cohen6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSteve Gao vs Patrick Slutzky6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesIkjae Chin vs Brian Downing6-1, 6-0
L#1 DoublesDaniel Aller / Tim TIambeng vs Joseph Kaiser / Dan Joslin4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesDean DeKranis vs Mathew Schneider6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHarry Kim / Ikjae Chin vs Kiwon Lee / Jared Daniels6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesAnbo Zhou vs Peter Massa6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2026-06-23vs Birchwood: 18+ 3.0 MWon 30
W#1 DoublesDaniel Hopemark / Ikjae Chin vs Shanon Lacorte / Kevin Simon6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesFrank Huang / David Gage vs Matthew Cohen / Richard Ma6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesWeijiang Dong vs Bradley Adler7-6, 5-3
2026-06-09vs Birchwood: 18+ 3.0 MWon 21
W#1 DoublesTim TIambeng / Harry Kim vs Matthew Gavin / Sean Foster6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDean DeKranis vs Kevin Simon6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBrian Doherty / Anbo Zhou vs Matthew Cohen / Dave Katz6-7, 4-6
2026-05-19vs TarryCrest - 18+ - 3.0MWon 30
W#1 DoublesTim TIambeng / Anbo Zhou vs Hernan Lopez / Kevin Russell6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJianming Kang vs Antonio Muinos6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDaniel Hopemark / Daniel Aller vs Joseph Kelly / Erich Wasserman6-1, 6-0
2026-05-12vs Torview Evolution Tennis 18+ 3.0MWon 30
W#1 DoublesHarry Kim / Tim TIambeng vs Brian Downing / Benedict Tran6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesJianming Kang vs Ray Yeung6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAnbo Zhou / Frank Huang vs Ron Vilar / Ralph Carter4-0
W#1 DoublesDaniel Aller / Ikjae Chin vs Lawrence Ward / Tony Burton6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSteve Gao vs Kent Anker6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Zinger / Daniel Harrigan vs Andrew Sabol / Jeffrey Sutton6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesWeijiang Dong vs Larry Reinharz6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Dean DeKranis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Frank Huang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Harry Kim
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.07
Jianming Kang
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.05
Anbo Zhou
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
3.04
Daniel Aller
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.03
Ikjae Chin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.02
Tim TIambeng
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
2.98
Daniel Hopemark
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
David Zinger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.81
Daniel Harrigan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.77
David Gage
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Brian Doherty
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Steve Gao
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Weijiang Dong
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Zinger + Daniel Harrigan5256% games−8.5% vs expected
Daniel Aller + Daniel Harrigan314 matchesnot enough data
Harry Kim + Anbo Zhou314 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Aller + David Zinger123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dean DeKranis
4W–1L career · type D · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Frank Huang
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.09
Harry Kim
11W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.08
Jianming Kang
8W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.07
3
Anbo Zhou
7W–2L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Daniel Aller
111W–60L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
Ikjae Chin
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.03
Tim TIambeng
19W–15L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Daniel Hopemark
9W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
David Zinger
17W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.85
3
Daniel Harrigan
24W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
2.81
3
David Gage
12W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Brian Doherty
23W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Steve Gao
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Weijiang Dong
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.