Teams

Team Hawk

2021 Frederick County Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over Men 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.57 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-06-03vs Team BradLost 01
L#2 DoublesMajed Hamawy / Dang Hoang vs Darin Gordon / Brian Lynk3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-05-29vs Team BradSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRichard Spicer / Christopher Williams vs Phillip Harvin / Sithisak Sutsakhan6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesIvan Kozliak vs Scott Smith4-6, 6-7
2021-05-25vs Team BradLost 02
L#1 DoublesChristopher Williams / Eugene Spencer vs Kevin Gass / Matthew McGreevy2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesThomas Dolan / Majed Hamawy vs Scott Young / Jack Lu3-6, 5-7
2021-05-19vs Team BradWon 20
W#2 DoublesEugene Spencer / Majed Hamawy vs Mark Stine / Phillip Harvin3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTim Sawyer / Christopher Williams vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-05-17vs Team BradWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristopher Williams / Richard Spicer vs Glenn Mann / Mark Stine6-1, 6-0
2021-05-14vs Team BradWon 10
W#1 SinglesIvan Kozliak vs Ira Daar6-4, 6-1
2021-05-12vs Team BradWon 10
W#2 DoublesIvan Kozliak / Majed Hamawy vs Joseph Jacangelo / Matthew McGreevy6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2021-05-08vs Team BradLost 02
L#1 DoublesMike Kiefer / Christopher Williams vs William Lemons / Joseph Jacangelo3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMajed Hamawy / Dang Hoang vs Mark Stine / Mark Labozzetta6-7, 4-6
2021-05-05vs Team BradWon 10
W#2 SinglesIvan Kozliak vs Chris Cocca6-3, 4-4
2021-05-01vs Team BradSplit 11
W#1 SinglesIvan Kozliak vs Chris Cocca6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDang Hoang / Majed Hamawy vs Brian Lynk / Sithisak Sutsakhan4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Brandon Yen
published 4
3.61
Ivan Kozliak
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.27
Don Barry
published 3.5
Christopher Williams
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.16
Richard Spicer
published
3.13
Anthony Schifano
published 3.5
3.10
Eugene Spencer
published 3.5
2.98
Majed Hamawy
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
Martin Hawk
published
Tim Sawyer
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brandon Yen
18W–13L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Ivan Kozliak
300W–288L career · 5 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Don Barry
3W–6L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Christopher Williams
109W–110L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Richard Spicer
4W–2L career · no lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Anthony Schifano
2W–8L career · no lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Eugene Spencer
7W–27L career · no lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.10
3
Majed Hamawy
379W–517L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%57%43%
2.98
Martin Hawk
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tim Sawyer
8W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.