Teams

Tran - RS Clay

2026 Escambia Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 40 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-02-25vs Bonsignore - RS ClayLost 02
L#2 DoublesJonathan Llanera / Marina Agadzi vs James Richardson / Kimberly Fortier6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKristyn Miller / Clay Anderson vs Susan Bonsignore / Tracy Schmidt4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-02-18vs Wallace - RS ClayLost 01
L#3 DoublesClay Anderson / Denise Wilson vs Gregory Gill / Thuy Nguyen6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2026-02-04vs Escambia/McElhanyLost 03
L#1 DoublesWade Wilson / Kristyn Miller vs Michael Yager / Lauren Burch2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMarina Agadzi / Jonathan Llanera vs Natalie Mcelhany / Matthew O'Neill1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChristopher Brown / Liz Payne vs Rick Cuny / Megan Frederick3-6, 2-6
2026-01-28vs Wallace - RS ClayWon 10
W#2 DoublesDenise Wilson / Wade Wilson vs Kenneth Wallace / Chelsea Simpson6-1, 7-5
2026-01-21vs Bonsignore - RS ClayWon 10
W#2 DoublesWade Wilson / Kristyn Miller vs Andrew Hillman / Celine Hansford6-2, 6-2
2026-01-07vs LeCoq - RS ClayWon 20
W#2 DoublesWade Wilson / Denise Wilson vs KL LeCOQ / Marie Steen6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJonathan Llanera / Marina Agadzi vs John Whitehead / Karen Penn6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Christopher Brown
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.59
Marina Agadzi
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.52
Kristyn Miller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Wade Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.20
Denise Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Clay Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.97
Jeanna Dulyanai
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Victor Agadzi
published
2.91
Liz Payne
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.84
Jonathan Llanera
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wade Wilson + Denise Wilson7256% games+2.1% vs expected
Kristyn Miller + Clay Anderson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christopher Brown
11W–17L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Marina Agadzi
42W–59L career · 8 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.59
Kristyn Miller
134W–112L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.52
Wade Wilson
24W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Denise Wilson
13W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Clay Anderson
32W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.15
Jeanna Dulyanai
9W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
Victor Agadzi
7W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
Liz Payne
139W–105L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
Jonathan Llanera
22W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.