Teams

B5 CCV Reifsnider/Brannan

2023 Richmond Combo Mixed · Richmond Combo Mixed 6.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-11-19vs B6 Avalon George 6.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesJonathan Henry / Kirsti Goodwin vs Chris Giacchi / Kim Schultz7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2023-10-15vs B7 Westwood PokeyBergLost 01
L#2 DoublesSpotty Robins / Kirsti Goodwin vs Erik Ringberg / Amy Ringberg4-6, 4-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Mixed 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
3.94
Megan Hodges
published
3.86
Whitson Huffman
published
3.83
3.73
Ashley Millen
published 4
3.65
Joseph Parker
published
3.63
3.49
Jonathan Henry
published
3.42
Nathan Knight
published
3.33
Kristin Mullins
published
Elizabeth Toohers
published 3.5
3.13
Taylor Brannan
published
3.06
Spotty Robins
published
3.03
Connell Mullins
published 3.5
2.98
Kirsti Goodwin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Patrick Toohers
published
Robin Reifsnider
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Whitson Huffman + Alexandra Huffman224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Catherine Benevento
14W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
4.00
Megan Hodges
20W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.94
Whitson Huffman
19W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Alexandra Huffman
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Ashley Millen
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
Joseph Parker
11W–4L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Cary Campbell-Knight
17W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%16%84%
3.63
Jonathan Henry
30W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
3.49
Nathan Knight
15W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.42
Kristin Mullins
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Elizabeth Toohers
1W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Taylor Brannan
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.13
Spotty Robins
23W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%32%68%
3.06
3.5
Connell Mullins
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.03
Kirsti Goodwin
56W–53L career · 2 lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
2.98
Patrick Toohers
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
Robin Reifsnider
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.