Teams

Youzhnys 8.5

2021 ITA MIXED DOUBLES - BOISE · TV

15 players · average NTRP 4.27 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-09-24vs Mixed Love/8.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBrad Hines / Vanessa Almaraz vs Greg Knudsen / Heidi Maimer2-6, 3-6
2021-09-14vs FuhgeddaboutitWon 10
W#2 DoublesZachary Fohn / Donna Polk vs Joshua Collins / Jessica Jensen6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2021-09-02vs Get Your Shot TogetherWon 10
W#2 DoublesZachary Fohn / Donna Polk vs Bobette Wood / Di-Yuan Tzeng0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-08-31vs Tap that AceWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrad Hines / Vanessa Almaraz vs Travis Hopkey / Debbie Wachtell6-4, 6-1
2021-08-24vs FuhgeddaboutitWon 10
W#2 DoublesVanessa Almaraz / Cardale Herzog vs Bob Lounsbury / Jessica Jensen6-3, 6-3
2021-08-18vs Tap that AceWon 10
W#2 DoublesVanessa Almaraz / Cardale Herzog vs Ryan Stewart / Jane Perlaky6-2, 6-3
2021-08-17vs RacketeersLost 01
L#2 DoublesBrad Hines / Donna Polk vs Gina Sharp / Bill Sharp6-2, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Get Your Shot Together10023717204
2Youzhnys 8.564201022225
3Racketeers55131738297
4Mixed Love/8.546151535286
5Fuhgeddaboutit2882247332

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.61
Isaac Dodd
published 5
4.56
Zachary Fohn
published 4.5
4.32
Leiana Almaraz
published 4.5
4.17
Pratap Murali
published 4.5
4.11
Hanna Jacobs
published 4.5
4.05
Vanessa Almaraz
published 4.5
3.97
Kristen Jacobs
published 4
3.87
Suzanna Murali
published 4
3.77
Donna Polk
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Cardale Herzog
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Jacob Sessions
published 4
3.62
Colleen Schoeck
published 4
Brad Hines
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Michael Harvey
published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hanna Jacobs + Zachary Fohn15271% games+9.7% vs expected
Suzanna Murali + Jacob Sessions13262% games+4.2% vs expected
Jacob Sessions + Vanessa Almaraz12354% games+2.5% vs expected
Suzanna Murali + Pratap Murali161849% games−3.4% vs expected
Chris Christensen + Donna Polk21240% gamesnot enough data
Brad Hines + Vanessa Almaraz21041% gamesnot enough data
Brad Hines + Donna Polk4252% gamesnot enough data
Kristen Jacobs + Cardale Herzog404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Isaac Dodd
31W–12L career · no lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
4.61
4.5
Zachary Fohn
150W–36L career · no lines in 2021
<1%31%69%
4.56
4.5
Leiana Almaraz
58W–55L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
Pratap Murali
99W–69L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Hanna Jacobs
91W–66L career · no lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
4.11
4.5
Vanessa Almaraz
106W–105L career · no lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Kristen Jacobs
212W–92L career · no lines in 2021
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Suzanna Murali
297W–165L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Chris Christensen
61W–69L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Donna Polk
35W–38L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Cardale Herzog
22W–36L career · 2 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Jacob Sessions
109W–73L career · no lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Colleen Schoeck
125W–67L career · no lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
3.62
Brad Hines
36W–38L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
0
Michael Harvey
216W–85L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.