Teams

Wolffe/LF 6.0-8.0

2025 TUL TRI_LEVEL MIXED 18 & Over · MIXED 6.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-14vs Lott Green/FR 6.0-8.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesRyan Hale / Natalie Evans vs Andy Blankenship / Joanie Bonfield Dinneen6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAdam Teague / Stacy Teague vs Beth Scruggs / Daniel Wheeler4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStephen Wolff / Emily Hale vs Kathy Gary / Derek Gary1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-08-31vs Evans/GR 6.0-8.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesNick Bunting / Emily Hale vs Sarah Washatka / Brandon Washatka5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJulie Bunting / Cole Huebert vs Sandy Hightower / Byron Canfield4-6, 0-6
2025-08-17vs Nichols/PH 6.0-8.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesRyan Hale / Natalie Evans vs Stefanie Lee / Christian Huntley4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAdam Teague / Stacy Teague vs Ethan Thomas / Abigail Fossett3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Bunting / Nick Bunting vs John Lee / Ashley Humphrey6-2, 6-4
2025-08-08vs Wood/SH 6.0-8.0Split 11
W#2 DoublesAdam Teague / Stacy Teague vs Laura Hawkins / Tony Jezek6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJulie Bunting / Nick Bunting vs Brandon Lenhart / Hilliary Lenhart4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-08-01vs Kimbrough/IS 6.0-8.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesCole Huebert / Avery Jones vs John Holcomb / Kathy Blackim2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesAdam Teague / Stacy Teague vs Sandy Stoner / Kevin Dick4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Bunting / Nick Bunting vs Carla Kimbrough / Kirk Brown6-2, 6-3
2025-07-27vs Santiago/LF 6.0-8.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesRyan Hale / Natalie Evans vs Bryan Beckman / Valerie Santiago6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJoel Fisher / Julie Bunting vs Jake Rowland / Tracie Wilson6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesStephen Wolff / Emily Hale vs John Page / Alexis Hubble6-0, 7-6
2025-07-20vs Freeman/GR 6.0-8.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCole Huebert / Avery Jones vs Drew Freeman / Trisha Millington2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesBailey Wolff / Ryan Hale vs Karthik Sekandlapuram / MONICA MCCAFFERTY1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesNick Bunting / Julie Bunting vs Jessica Ullrich / Malak Lopez4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings17 teams · MIXED 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hayes/IS 6.0-8.0702016115
2Stone/GR 6.0-8.07118616148
3Evans/GR 6.0-8.06117414159
4Freeman/GR 6.0-8.0511441097
5Nichols/PH 6.0-8.05214717175
6Wolffe/LF 6.0-8.05212924183
7Lolato/LF53111329217
8Lott Blue/FR 6.0-8.04211717131
9Martinez/IS 6.0-8.03591531245
10Schmidt/LF 6.0-8.035101432227
11Lott Green/FR 6.0-8.02351022142
12Lott Red/FR 6.0-8.02581326197
13Press/GR 6.0-8.026111326215
14Santiago/LF 6.0-8.01551330193
15Kimbrough/IS 6.0-8.01661531195
16Carlberg/LF 6.0-8.01742041264
17Wood/SH 6.0-8.00521327172

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Natalie Evans
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Joel Fisher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Cole Huebert
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.35
Julie Bunting
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Ryan Hale
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.25
Adam Teague
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Avery Jones
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Stacy Teague
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Bailey Wolff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Stephen Wolff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Nick Bunting
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.67
Emily Hale
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan Hale + Emily Hale171055% games+15.5% vs expected
Stephen Wolff + Bailey Wolff4355% games+9.9% vs expected
Stacy Teague + Adam Teague18559% games+6.6% vs expected
Julie Bunting + Nick Bunting10356% gamesnot enough data
Ryan Hale + Natalie Evans123 matchesnot enough data
Stephen Wolff + Emily Hale303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie Evans
28W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
3.85
Joel Fisher
14W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
4
Cole Huebert
0W–9L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.48
Julie Bunting
58W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
Ryan Hale
71W–45L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Adam Teague
59W–35L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Avery Jones
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stacy Teague
94W–42L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Bailey Wolff
40W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Stephen Wolff
36W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.19
Nick Bunting
15W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Emily Hale
56W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.