Teams

ELW Fries

2022 Pinellas Adult 40 & Over Spring Weekend · 3.5 W Saturday

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-16Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDebra Burwell / Martha Cornatzer vs Kelly Lang Cook / Becky Allison7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2022-05-21vs Pinellas - Bardmoor/GrossLost 01
L#3 DoublesMartha Cornatzer / Ana Jara vs Danielle Haggar / Cindy Ferguson5-7, 3-6
2022-05-07vs Tarpon BourgeoisWon 10
W#3 DoublesAna Jara / Liwen Tao vs Pamela Cotillo / Dorothy Thomas6-0, 6-2
2022-04-30vs Pinellas - Bardmoor/GrossLost 01
L#3 DoublesAna Jara / Joanne Dickson vs Anne Remie / Sally Blush1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-04-23vs Seminole Lake KelseyLost 01
L#2 DoublesDebra Burwell / Martha Cornatzer vs Ann Davis / Carol Vitelli7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2022-04-21Won 10
W#3 DoublesLou Reavis / Martha Cornatzer vs Bonnie Neiman / Carolyn Mirro7-6, 6-0
2022-04-16Won 10
W#3 DoublesMartha Cornatzer / Debra Burwell vs W A Mantell / Dorothy Rizzo6-4, 6-4
2022-04-02vs Seminole Lake CokeWon 20
W#1 SinglesMartha Cornatzer vs Renee DiVincent6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAna Jara / Paula Uselis vs Lisa Lowe / Hilary Tsai6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Andrea Villafranca
published 3.5
3.08
Martha Cornatzer
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Ana Jara
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.85
Noela Fries
published
2.73
Debra Burwell
published 3
Leslie McMahon
published
Lisa Patides
published
Liwen Tao
published
Lou Reavis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ana Jara + Martha Cornatzer3546% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andrea Villafranca
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Martha Cornatzer
117W–130L career · 9 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Ana Jara
47W–71L career · 4 lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.04
Noela Fries
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
2.85
3
Debra Burwell
6W–14L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Leslie McMahon
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Patides
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Liwen Tao
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lou Reavis
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.