Teams

Taylor-Woods/META

2026 Adult 40 & Over-META · 4.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-16vs Liu/METASplit 11
W#1 DoublesBenjamin Croux / Lance Taylor vs Daryl Addison / Matt Lavinder6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJerry Vaughn vs Julio Lanfranco4-6, 4-6
2026-05-13vs Liu/METASplit 11
L#1 SinglesJerry Vaughn vs Julio Lanfranco4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJoshua Woods / Benjamin Croux vs Tim Sturgill / Fernando Subijana6-0, 6-1
2026-05-10vs Liu/METAWon 30
W#1 DoublesBenjamin Croux / Ricky Frye vs Daryl Addison / Simon Temperton6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesTodd Wenzel vs Scott Higgins6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJoshua Woods / Daniel Unger vs Matt Snyder / Matt Lavinder7-6, 6-3
2026-05-05vs Liu/METASplit 11
L#1 DoublesLance Taylor / Jeffrey Miller vs Daryl Addison / Fernando Subijana1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBart Kennedy / Rodger Acklin vs Ke Liu / Simon Temperton6-2, 6-2
2026-05-03vs Liu/METAWon 21
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Miller / Lance Taylor vs Jim Green / Matt Lavinder3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesRandy Belt vs Daryl Addison6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDaniel Unger / Rodger Acklin vs Matt Snyder / Ke Liu6-1, 6-3
2026-04-29vs Liu/METAWon 21
W#1 DoublesBenjamin Croux / Bart Kennedy vs Tim Sturgill / Simon Temperton6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesEric Pope vs Scott Higgins6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJoshua Woods / Jeffrey Miller vs Ke Liu / Fernando Subijana4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Taylor-Woods/META50164890

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Benjamin Croux
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.88
Eric Pope
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.88
Jerry Vaughn
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.82
Daniel Unger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Bart Kennedy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.71
Joshua Woods
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Todd Wenzel
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.51
Lance Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Randy Belt
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Rodger Acklin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Benjamin Croux
10W–1L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
4.02
4
Eric Pope
6W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.88
Jerry Vaughn
54W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.88
4
Daniel Unger
49W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Bart Kennedy
8W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Joshua Woods
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.71
Todd Wenzel
16W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%1%
3.69
Lance Taylor
20W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.51
Randy Belt
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Rodger Acklin
6W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.