Teams

CCV Murphy/Parker

2025 Richmond Combo Weekend · Richmond Combo Weekend 7.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.70 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-31vs WW Thunderstruck - MullahyWon 20
W#1 DoublesJD Wright / John Reifsnider vs Jeff Hause / Sean DiBlasi6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAdam Baker / Alvaro Zeballos vs Dutch Jones / James Mullahy6-3, 6-4
2025-08-24vs Miracles - MarksWon 20
W#1 DoublesWhitson Huffman / Wit Robertson vs Christopher Kochensparger / Gianni R Snidle6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJohn Reifsnider / Jonathan Henry vs Christopher Quirk / Tracy Marks6-2, 6-2
2025-07-26vs Prestige Worldwide - DanielWon 21
W#1 DoublesWhitson Huffman / JD Wright vs Ward Hackett / Jamie Kane6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAlvaro Zeballos / Hunter Gallalee vs Carter Hayes / Zach Daniel7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGray Clarke / Taylor Brannan vs Creighton Anders / Karl Kirkeby5-7, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Weekend 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Hunter Gallalee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.86
Whitson Huffman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.86
Gray Clarke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
John Reifsnider Jr
published
3.65
Joseph Parker
published
3.60
Wit Robertson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
John Reifsnider
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.49
Jonathan Henry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Carter Whisnand
published 3.5
3.41
Ty Wellford
published
3.30
Alvaro Zeballos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Geoff Gardner
published 3.5
3.13
Taylor Brannan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Whitson Huffman + Hunter Gallalee4263% games+6.7% vs expected
Jonathan Henry + Carter Whisnand4161% gamesnot enough data
Jonathan Henry + Ty Wellford213 matchesnot enough data
Joseph Parker + Ty Wellford123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Hunter Gallalee
17W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.93
Whitson Huffman
19W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Gray Clarke
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%86%13%
3.86
John Reifsnider Jr
22W–4L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.67
Joseph Parker
11W–4L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
3.65
Wit Robertson
18W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.60
John Reifsnider
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.59
Jonathan Henry
30W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Carter Whisnand
18W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.45
Ty Wellford
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.41
3.5
Alvaro Zeballos
18W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Geoff Gardner
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Taylor Brannan
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.