Teams

Lyder/DeMeo

2023 18&Over Fall Non-Advancing · 3.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / METROPOLITAN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-11-19vs ChoyLost 03
L#1 DoublesJosh Spiegel / John Gallacher vs Eduardo Mere / Teddy Miller1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMarcos Sueiro vs Helcio Santos2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMarc Zeitoun / Daniel Lawee vs Alvin Choy / Justin Love1-6, 0-6
2023-11-13vs CohenWon 21
W#1 DoublesRoger Lyder / Josh Spiegel vs Tabber Benedict / Eric Walsh6-4, 6-7
L#1 SinglesPaul Haydon vs Cezary Korz2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMarc Zeitoun / John Gallacher vs Stuart Framm / Kevin Lannan6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2023-10-30vs JhaveriLost 02
L#1 DoublesJosh Spiegel / John Gallacher vs Amish Jhaveri / Matthew Scott6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMarcos Sueiro vs Christopher Delquaglio1-6, 5-7
2023-10-22vs QuachSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJosh Spiegel / Marc Zeitoun vs TK Kong / Jordon Jew1-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesPaul Haydon vs Genie Mu6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2023-10-16vs BhagwagarLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarcos Sueiro / Josh Spiegel vs Karan Bhugra / Maximilian Paulus0-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesJohn Gallacher vs Jordan Chang1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRoger Lyder / Vasco Ivanov vs Kazuharu Hara / Shien Lee4-6, 3-6
2023-10-01vs Full Metal RacquetLost 02
L#1 DoublesRoger Lyder / Josh Spiegel vs Erik Ulin / David Kay2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesVasco Ivanov / Marcos Sueiro vs Jeremy Reifer / Nasiruddin Alamgir6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2023-09-27vs TamLost 02
L#1 DoublesJohn Gallacher / Zachary Goldman vs Michael Wong / Peter Kung3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesPaul Haydon vs Nick Teo2-6, 5-7
2023-09-17vs PhamLost 02
L#1 DoublesPaul Haydon / Roger Lyder vs Stephen Zacks / Marcin Rojek5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJosh Spiegel / Marc Zeitoun vs Kim Long Pham / Seth Rosner4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Bhowal0681021155
2Cohen0881229241
3Lyder/DeMeo0851839246
4Quach0851939268
5Full Metal Racquet0920715152
6Pham09131429202
7Tam09111534244
8Jhaveri09101635248

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Michael DeMeo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Josh Spiegel
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.02
John Gallacher
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.98
Talal Khan
published
2.96
Paul Haydon
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.79
Marc Zeitoun
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Daniel Lawee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Marcos Sueiro
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Roger Lyder
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Vasco Ivanov
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Warren St. John
published
Wojciech Jackowski
published
Zachary Goldman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Gallacher + Paul Haydon3250% gamesnot enough data
Daniel Lawee + Marc Zeitoun044 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Lawee + Marcos Sueiro134 matchesnot enough data
Marc Zeitoun + Roger Lyder044 matchesnot enough data
Marc Zeitoun + Paul Haydon134 matchesnot enough data
Josh Spiegel + Paul Haydon404 matchesnot enough data
Wojciech Jackowski + Roger Lyder033 matchesnot enough data
Roger Lyder + John Gallacher213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael DeMeo
33W–66L career · 5 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.58
Josh Spiegel
26W–21L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%92%8%
3.31
John Gallacher
15W–20L career · 5 lines in 2023
44%55%<1%
3.02
Talal Khan
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
2.98
Paul Haydon
15W–27L career · 4 lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.96
Marc Zeitoun
3W–34L career · 4 lines in 2023
95%5%<1%
2.79
3
Daniel Lawee
3W–22L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Marcos Sueiro
6W–29L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Roger Lyder
10W–33L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Vasco Ivanov
1W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Warren St. John
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Wojciech Jackowski
2W–18L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Zachary Goldman
0W–10L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.