Teams

Still Serving Coleman RTC

2026 USTA League Tennis Adult 40 & Over - RO · 3.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-10vs Racquet Society Reeve RTCLost 14
W#1 DoublesMelanie Lyden / Eileen Anderson vs Jessica Balcom / Brittany Thomas6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMelissa Coleman vs Elizabeth Cozine4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKrista Batzel / Roxann Pike vs Marine Murphree / Hilary DuBrock1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRachel Bulbulian / Melinda Aakre vs Anna Reeve / Julia Routman5-7, 1-6
L#4 DoublesSHUPEI LIU / Audra Quandt vs Charie Diehn / Alaine Westra0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-05-03vs 40 Love Skalski Clark RACWon 41
L#1 DoublesMagdalena Geske / Melanie Lyden vs Leslie Clark / Lynne Peterson6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMelissa Coleman vs Mashele Huschka6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEileen Anderson / Jane Rosenman vs Helena Soares / Michelle Duchateau7-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesRoxann Pike / Krista Batzel vs Catherine Hurley / Lisa Hartert7-6, 6-1
W#4 DoublesSHUPEI LIU / Andrea Hunderfund vs Paramita Majumder / Nada Farry6-4, 7-6
2026-04-19vs Racquet Society Reeve RTCSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMelissa Coleman / Magdalena Geske vs Jessica Balcom / Brittany Thomas2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJane Peloquin / Melanie Lyden vs Hilary DuBrock / Julia Routman4-6, 5-5
W#3 DoublesJane Rosenman / Eileen Anderson vs Anita Stoltenberg / Elizabeth Cozine6-3, 6-2
W#4 DoublesMelinda Aakre / Rachel Bulbulian vs Anna Strand / Alaine Westra6-4, 6-4
2026-04-12vs 40 Love Skalski Clark RACWon 21
L#1 DoublesMagdalena Geske / Melanie Lyden vs Lynne Peterson / Katie Juskewitch4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJane Peloquin / Eileen Anderson vs Catherine Hurley / Darina Temesgen6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRachel Bulbulian / Audra Quandt vs Mashele Huschka / Amelia Barwise6-2, 6-4
2026-04-04vs 40 Love Skalski Clark RACWon 41
L#1 DoublesMelissa Coleman / Melanie Lyden vs Leslie Clark / Michelle Duchateau4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMagdalena Geske vs Katie Juskewitch7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEileen Anderson / Roxann Pike vs Catherine Hurley / Lisa Hartert6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRachel Bulbulian / Audra Quandt vs Lynne Peterson / Mashele Huschka6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#4 DoublesMelinda Aakre / Jane Peloquin vs Paramita Majumder / Becky Westerhouse6-3, 6-2
2026-03-22vs Racquet Society Reeve RTCLost 23
L#1 DoublesEve Dieterman / Rachel Bulbulian vs Marine Murphree / Anita Stoltenberg6-2, 6-7
L#1 SinglesEileen Anderson vs Elizabeth Cozine3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJane Rosenman / Jane Peloquin vs Anna Reeve / Sarah Burke6-4, 5-3
L#3 DoublesMelinda Aakre / Krista Batzel vs Jessica Balcom / Brittany Thomas4-6, 2-6
W#4 DoublesSHUPEI LIU / Audra Quandt vs Alaine Westra / Anna Strand5-7, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Racquet Society Reeve RTC51171331255
2Still Serving Coleman RTC33171328255
340 Love Skalski Clark RAC15111942303

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Roxann Pike
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Melanie Lyden
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #4 Doubles 22% · published
2.90
Rachel Bulbulian
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.89
Jane Rosenman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Jane Peloquin
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
Andrea Hunderfund
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Melissa Coleman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.73
Audra Quandt
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.71
Magdalena Geske
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
2.68
Eileen Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
2.53
Melinda Aakre
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
2.45
Krista Batzel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.22
SHUPEI LIU
usually #4 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Eve Dieterman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Magdalena Geske + Melanie Lyden3447% games+2.8% vs expected
Melinda Aakre + Rachel Bulbulian3254% games−5.9% vs expected
Melissa Coleman + Eileen Anderson314 matchesnot enough data
Jane Rosenman + Eileen Anderson314 matchesnot enough data
Eileen Anderson + Audra Quandt224 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Coleman + Melanie Lyden123 matchesnot enough data
Melinda Aakre + Krista Batzel123 matchesnot enough data
Magdalena Geske + Eve Dieterman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Roxann Pike
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
Melanie Lyden
30W–23L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
Rachel Bulbulian
14W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
Jane Rosenman
15W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
Jane Peloquin
7W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Andrea Hunderfund
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Melissa Coleman
13W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Audra Quandt
17W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Magdalena Geske
9W–18L career · 7 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Eileen Anderson
14W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
2.68
Melinda Aakre
13W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
2.53
Krista Batzel
8W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.45
SHUPEI LIU
6W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
Eve Dieterman
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.