Teams

Gainer

2025 South East Tennis Singles 40 & Over League · 2.5 Women 40 & over (NO STATE ADVANCEMENT)

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-02-23vs HilliardWon 30
W#1 SinglesKimberly Bassano vs Robin Bradley6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesDiane Byrd vs Jennifer Rigby6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesJennifer McCall vs Katrina Summers6-0, 6-0
2025-02-18vs HilliardWon 30
W#1 SinglesHelen Gainer vs Amanda Parmer6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesKimberly Bassano vs Noelle Morgan6-0, 6-4
W#3 SinglesSutton Boney vs Robin Bradley6-2, 6-1
2025-02-09vs HilliardWon 21
W#1 SinglesJulia Vogt vs Jennifer Rigby6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesDiane Byrd vs Robin Bradley6-0, 6-0
L#3 SinglesJennifer McCall vs Catherine Gill2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-02-02vs HilliardWon 30
W#1 SinglesKimberly Bassano vs Rebecca Mickler6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesSutton Boney vs Katrina Summers6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesHelen Gainer vs Amanda Parmer6-0, 6-2
2025-01-28vs HilliardWon 30
W#1 SinglesJulia Vogt vs Catherine Gill6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesDiane Byrd vs Valerie Oldfield7-5, 7-5
W#3 SinglesSutton Boney vs Jennifer Rigby6-2, 6-0
2025-01-26vs HilliardWon 30
W#1 SinglesJulia Vogt vs Bess Hilliard6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesHelen Gainer vs Robin Bradley6-0, 6-1
W#3 SinglesJennifer McCall vs Katrina Summers6-0, 6-4
2025-01-14vs HilliardWon 30
W#1 SinglesJulia Vogt vs Rebecca Mickler6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesKimberly Bassano vs Amanda Parmer6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesHelen Gainer vs Noelle Morgan6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women 40 & over (NO STATE ADVANCEMENT) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Julia Vogt
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.88
Kimberly Bassano
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.83
Helen Gainer
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.60
Jennifer McCall
usually #3 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
2.55
Diane Byrd
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.48
Elizabeth Borges
published
2.42
Sutton Boney
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Byrd + Helen Gainer224 matchesnot enough data
Helen Gainer + Kimberly Bassano404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julia Vogt
61W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.07
Kimberly Bassano
32W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
Helen Gainer
61W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Jennifer McCall
24W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
2.5
Diane Byrd
30W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%36%64%
2.55
Elizabeth Borges
31W–14L career · no lines in 2025
0%57%43%
2.48
Sutton Boney
19W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%70%30%
2.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.